Answer:
Without refuting the fact that Islamic punishments are indeed very
severe and harsh, two things may perhaps help you in understanding the
nature and logic of this severity:
The first thing that needs to be kept in mind is that if one reflects on the
style and linguistic constructions in which these punishments are mentioned
in the Qur’ān, it comes to light that these punishments are extreme forms of
reproof. They are to be given only and only if the extent of the crime and
the state of the person who has committed the crime deserve no leniency. In
other words, the fact that whether a person has committed a particular crime
or not is not the only factor to be ascertained by the court; equally
important is the information concerning the factors which led to the crime
and the state of the person who committed the crime. If this information
induces a judge to decide that the crime has not been committed in its
ultimate form, he has all the authority to punish the criminal with lesser
punishments like fining him or having him beaten up. Precisely, on such
grounds, in a particular case, the Caliph ‘Umar (rta) refused to amputate
the hand of a person who was forced to steal because of hunger simply
because he thought the circumstances were such that the person deserved
leniency. It is known that there was a severe drought during his rule and it
was in this drought that the incident had taken place. In other words, one
can easily conclude that in this particular aspect the Islamic penal code is
no different from most other penal codes.
The second important thing that needs to be taken into consideration is that
the purpose of most Islamic punishments is not merely to punish the
criminal, but to make his punishment an act of deterrence for any further
instance of the crime. Everyone would agree that peace and security of a
society occupy fundamental importance if it is to develop and prosper.
Societies which are crime ridden and in which people feel insecure obviously
soon disintegrate and eventually have no role in the development of culture
and civilization. As such, it is the primary responsibility of a government
to make sure that the life, wealth and honour of its citizens are protected
to the utmost. Besides educating and instructing people so that they have
morally sound personalities, it is necessary to severely punish people who
in spite of being provided with the opportunities of life exceed limits by
playing with the life, wealth and honour of others. In order to cleanse a
society from crime as much as possible, Islam wants to make an example of
people who create nuisance in the society and disrupt its peace and
tranquillity. Consequently, the punishments it prescribes are instrumental
in bringing peace and security to a society as far as possible.
|