Answer:
The term Makrūh does not belong to the basic
religious sources of the Sharī‘ah rather it has been coined by some juristic
schools of thought. Some of the jurists believe that if a weak tradition
ascribed to the Holy Prophet (sws) renders something forbidden then it is Makrūh.
We understand that the Sharī‘ah prohibits only four things which include flesh
of swine, carrion, poured out blood and animals consecrated in the name of
deities other than God. This is what we find in the Sharī‘ah regarding Halāl and
Harām foods. As far as other foods are concerned, humans innately know what they
should eat and what they should not. They, by virtue of the innate guidance
provided to them, are aware of the fact that certain things are edible and
others are not. The Holy Qur’ān also tacitly approves of this distinction and
refers to this innate guidance bestowed on man where it says that men should eat
Tayyibāt (i.e. the pure things) (Qur’ān, 5:4). It has implicitly informed us
that this distinction between the pure and the impure among the edibles is
inherently known to man.
The traditions ascribed to the Holy Prophet (sws) in this
regard refer to this innate knowledge of human beings. The jurists took them as
independent directives and classified the traditions according to the degree of
reliability as sound and weak. The things which they came to know about through
less authentic traditions they classified as Makrūh. However, it is clear from
the foregoing paragraphs that these traditions mostly make use of the innate
guidance of man regarding edibles and therefore should be understood on this
basis. |