Author: Riaz Hassan
Publisher: Oxford University Press
Year: 2002
Synopsis
Faithlines – Muslim Conceptions of Islam and Society, by
Riaz Hassan, is a sociological study of Muslims’ attitudes towards the ummah and
key contemporary issues in the Muslim world. Using a wide-ranging study based on
carefully constructed questionnaires, Hassan takes the reader on a trip to
explore the multi-dimensional religious landscapes of four strategically chosen
Muslim countries, examining how sociological factors have played a dynamic role
in shaping them.
The surveys used have been framed using established
sociologists’ and political thinkers’ constructs and typologies. Employing the
services and technology of respected surveying institutions in each country,
besides well-qualified interviewers, an effort was made to gather together a
credible representation of the religiously-aware public. However, as random
sampling was not used in selecting the samples, the results, as Hassan himself
states, cannot be generalized to the entire population. Using statistical
evidence, Hassan explores the relationships between religion and Muslim
attitudes towards gender, the state, the Islamic ummah, and the rest of the
world. He explores the reasons for and consequences of religious fundamentalism
and attempts to map the current and future political and global standing of the
Muslim world.
Building on the evidence, Hassan shows that Islam is not a
stagnant and unchanging phenomenon as it is generally perceived to be. He
challenges traditionalist Islamic thinking, and closes down on some very
interesting conclusions.
Chapter-wise Summary
Chapter One: Introduction
Hassan begins his book with a brief overview of the
general socio-economical conditions of the Muslim world, and their overall
backwardness. He then goes on to discuss possible reasons for their condition,
referring to works by prominent Muslim as well as non-Muslim social scientists
and politicians. He gives special importance to Fadl al-Rahman, whose
understanding of the Muslim world’s backwardness lies in its tendency to contain
obstacles to progress in the form of the opposition to the “rethinking and
reformulation” of Islam by the ‘ulama within. Talking about Islamic
fundamentalism, Hassan presents three established theories which try to explain
it. He introduces the basic issues of the contemporary Islamic world covered in
the book, mainly: the Islamic ummah and state, gender issues, and Muslim
perceptions of the self and the “other”. Finally, he highlights the aims of his
study and the methodologies used in conducting the surveys, and briefs the
reader about the four Muslim countries surveyed – Indonesia, Kazakhstan,
Pakistan and Egypt.
Chapter Two: Muslim Piety
This chapter aims to explore the sociological nature,
content and expression of Muslim Piety, based on empirical studies. The author
uses the works of Stark and Glock to define Muslim “religiosity” as a
multi-dimensional phenomenon, and bases his study of it on five dimensions
(Ideological, Ritualistic, Devotional, Experiential and Consequential). Using
the results, Hassan concludes that Muslims from all walks of life share a common
self-image of Islam and are generally quite religious. Given the social and
political differences between the formerly communized Kazakhstan and the other
three countries, he maintains that piety is a socially constructed phenomenon,
and differentiates between traditional and non-traditional religious commitment.
Chapter Three: The Islamic Ummah – Myth or Reality
Giving a brief overview of the concept and history of the
ummah, Hassan establishes that the essentially theological ummah established by
the Holy Prophet (sws) to promote unity is not the same institution as the ummah
of today, which has evolved, due to political and social influences, into an
all-encompassing collective Muslim identity with political implications. The
empirical evidence presented proves that the ummah consciousness is very much a
reality in all the Muslim countries surveyed.
The last part of the chapter discusses the impact of
modernity on the ummah’s development and evolution and its consequences. Noting
the current fragmented condition of the Muslim world and the fact that despite
all Muslim countries’ conforming to some form of ummah consciousness there
remain differences in its pervasiveness and intensity, Hassan concludes that the
only way for religion to gain wide acceptance with the masses is by playing an
effective role in solving society’s problems. He maintains that it must be
autonomous from the state to do so. Hence secularization is the ultimate
solution and consequence of an Islamic, or “undifferentiated”, state.
Highlighting the clash between “authentic Islam” and “hybrid Islam” – the mix of
different Muslim countries’ cultures, which is a result of the globalization
process – he proposes that “fundamentalism” is the reaction to Islamic
“hybridity” of traditional scholars who support “authentic” Islamic. He
concludes that in order for the Muslim world to be successful, the Muslim ummah
should divide into several regional ummahs. This will help each regional ummah
concentrate, unhindered, on progressing forward according to Islam in the
context of its own people, culture, history, and political environment.
Chapter Four: The Self-Image of Islam
This chapter discusses sociologists’ ideas in relation to
the self-image of Islam, identifying its worldview and self-image and the
underlying reasons for the existence of Islamic fundamentalism. The works of
Watt identify key features of the traditional world-view and its essentially
self-sufficient and monolithic self-image; the main cause for fundamentalism is
seen as a “moral panic” due to the “crisis of self-image”, brought about by
modernization and globalization. Gellner distinguishes between “High Islam” –
the rigid, scripturalistic Islam of the religious elite – and “Folk Islam”, the
flexible, practical Islam of the masses. He sees the gradual inclination of
Muslims to “High” Islam as an impetus for fundamentalism, which, once again, is
a reactionary measure caused by global Western impact. Rahman uses a somewhat
similar typology, and discusses the clash as being between the literal and
intellectual Islam of the “modernists”, and the rigid and traditionalist, “folk
Islam”. Muslim feminist Mernissi believes that Islam today is a male-dominated
and politically manipulated phenomenon.
After a discussion of the above, Hassan differentiates
between “traditional” and “liberal” self-images of Islam and discusses the piety
of those holding these views. Then, based on Gellner’s typologies, he charts out
the current positions of Muslim countries today. They can be categorized as
fundamentalist-socially radical; liberal-socially radical;
fundamentalist-conservative or liberal-conservative.
Hassan sees the prevalent traditional perception of the
self-sufficiency of Islam and the “moral polarization” of Muslims presented by
the evidence to be an overly optimistic view of one’s religion, and he sees it
as one of the main reasons for the intellectual stagnation of the Muslims.
Chapter Five: Islamic State
Hassan bases this chapter on the fact that there is
currently no exemplary society where Islam and the state coexist
undifferentiated in peace and harmony. He distinguishes between “differentiated”
(or secular) states and “Islamic” states (those where religion are not
separated). Having developed a framework for the study of the attitudes of
Muslims towards different institutions, Hassan notes how, in secular states,
Muslims still place a considerable amount of trust in religious institutions,
while in undifferentiated Pakistan, religious institutions do not enjoy a lot of
the public’s trust. His interpretation of this data points to the fact that in
secular states people trust the religious institutions because these
institutions play a role in mobilizing resistance against a rather mistrusted
government. In the case of Pakistan, he concludes that because religion and
state are essentially implemented at the same level, people relate the failure
of the state to religion as well, and hence lose faith in both institutions.
Hassan reiterates his opinion that for Islam to gain the public’s trust, it
should perhaps not be implemented at state level.
Chapter Six: Gender Roles – Islamic Determinism or Social
Construction
Hassan admits that Islam is generally perceived to be a
misogynist religion, but then points out that this attitude of current Islam is
in fact not what it was originally meant to be; rather, he feels that the sacred
texts have been interpreted in such a way by influential scholars. This has
tainted the minds of the males of society and pushed them to believe that they
are superior to women. Hassan’s study of the general perceptions of Muslims of
gender roles across the four countries reveals interesting statistics. He
observes that Islam had one definite thing to say on this, and given the fact
that, according to previously presented evidence, Muslims across all four
countries are fairly religious, then the differences in attitudes towards gender
roles would not differ geographically as much as they do. He observes that this
must be because of the social construction rather than Islamic determinism of
gender roles. Kazakhstan, because of being formerly a communist country, has
better, more modern views on gender roles than Egypt, Pakistan and Indonesia.
Discussing the perceptions of gender roles in the four countries, in the context
of their individual cultural and historical background, he maintains that gender
roles are dynamic and are shaped by social, economic and political events,
rather than by Islam itself.
Chapter Seven: Attitudes towards Veiling and Patriarchy
Hassan presents information which he opines proves that
veiling is not a part of Islam itself but a function of the historical and
social influences of Arabia at the time that Islam was evolving. Given the fact
that Islam is a natural religion, Hassan argues against the claims of religious
scholars who give the impression that the entire woman is an embodiment of sex,
therefore to conceal her provocative sexuality she must cover her whole self.
This has ultimately led to the evolution of a society in which woman must be
hidden away from others, to the extent that it impinges on her ability to work
in public roles. Hassan’s empirical study tries to gauge how people view women’s
roles in society, and their attitudes towards patriarchy. He finds that in
general, Muslims, especially male Muslims, do believe in the traditionalist
stance. Where countries are differentiated and more secularized, so that the
women enjoy a higher standard of citizenship, he notes that it is the women in
these countries who are more traditional than their very liberal counterparts
residing in countries where their rights and citizenship status are apparently
not at par with modernity. He explains this by proposing that as the status of
woman increases, man’s status decreases, and his reaction is to develop more
traditionalist views about woman’s roles. However, as the women of these
societies feel a certain level of satisfaction with the State and religion, they
do not have reason to object to the traditionalist stance of the men. Hassan
feels that women in Muslim countries will inevitably face obstacles in their
struggle for equality.
Chapter Eight: Muslim Perceptions of the “Other”
Hassan shows that Muslims generally feel optimistic about
the global role of Islam. Also, a great proportion view other major countries as
anti-Islamic. This can prove problematic for those working towards an
understanding between Islam and the West. Hassan sees the positive self-image of
Islam, and especially the perceptions of other countries being anti-Islamic, as
an almost direct function of the cultural and political scenarios enshrouding
the general public of the four countries. But he feels that these “anti-Islamic
country” perceptions are exaggerated.
Chapter Nine: Conclusions
Having established the Muslims’ positive self-image and
general religiosity, Hassan states that the more education they obtain, the more
the general populations of Muslims shift away from fundamentalism, while still
remaining religious. He states once more that Muslims will place more trust in
religion if it is differentiated from the State, and believes this
disintegration will be the ultimate end of Muslim countries. Discussing Iran as
the case of a country which started out as an Islamic state but is today quite
successful with regards to modernity, Hassan feels this can be attributed to
Iran’s gradual secularization. He
sees Muslims’ universal intellectual stagnation as due to the old,
traditionalist and rigid interpretations of Qur’an and Sunnah. Finally, he sees
“hybridity” versus “authenticity” to be the main internal battle going on in the
Muslim world. The fight put up against hybridity is explained as the fear of a
loss of identity of the traditionalistic Islamicists. However, as globalization
necessitates cultural hybridity, they will have to accept that many different
interpretations can be made of sacred texts, which will ultimately give way to
modernity. Globalization is challenging the belief that Islam is a complete and
coded way of life, and it may facilitate the disintegration of the Islamic ummah
into small regional ones, where each ummah will abide by its own culture of
Islam. Then, having avoided conflict with each other, individual Muslim ummahs
may perhaps be able to revive the ‘sacred past’, as they will be able to make
progress without hindrance. The only thing left would be reform the politics of
Islam’s holy centers, Makkah and Madinah, to accommodate for the new ummahs.
Reviews
In her review of Faithlines, Pocock-Behiery feels that the
author has not been able to keep cleanly in the direction of his aims, and has
presented some contradictory explanations to the statistics presented. Most of
her dissatisfaction lies in the formulation of the survey questions used in the
surveys throughout the study. She
finds a “general lack of unity” in
the book and perceives it to be a rather ambitious attempt to cover too many
aspects of the Muslim worldview in too much detail.
Dr Gulzar Shah has mixed views on the book. He feels that
the extensive use of quantitative methods which back Hassan’s analysis greatly
enhance the reliability of the study. He appreciates the maturity and
readability of the framework of the study, and the fact that Hassan employs
tested and proven theories. For example, his study of religiosity is based on
established works by Stark and Glock. However, Dr Shah finds limitations in the
work, especially in the inherent weaknesses in the sampling techniques employed.
The samples used give a highly biased picture of Muslims’ perceptions, being as
over-represented by the literate population as they are. (Over 90% of
respondents had High School degrees, while the literacy rate in Pakistan is very
low.)
Notwithstanding the above, I feel that the primary aim of
this study is no doubt a laudable effort in providing a balanced sociological
analysis of the Muslim worldviews. However, I feel that Hassan falls somewhat
short of providing such an entirely balanced view, because, as Pocock-Behiery
contends, in trying to steer clear of apologetics, he ends up presenting once
again a somewhat stereotyped portrait of the Muslim world.
The issue of inappropriate survey questions, (besides
displaying a somewhat deficient understanding of Islam from within its own
perspectives) is in my opinion a manifestation of what I see to be a central
weakness of the paper – the fact that the main approach it has adopted is an
essentialist one. In attempting to present an objective view, the author borrows
heavily from Western constructs and ideas so that the study ultimately becomes a
Western perception of the facts.
Examining Muslim conceptions using Western frameworks, I feel, impair the
individuality of Islam. Dr Zaman
voiced the same opinion in his review of the book.
I also feel that Hassan’s presentation of Islam as a
divinely revealed religion, like Christianity or Judaism, is contradictory. On
one hand he admits that the sacred texts of Islam have been manipulated by those
in power, thereby acknowledging it
to be a divine and static phenomenon. Yet on the other hand he seems to be
drawing general conclusions about Islam itself using people’s perceptions. This
contradiction and essentialist approach is embodied in his idea of regional
ummahs, each with its own practicing version of Islam.
This idea, of each ummah operating according to its own Islam within the context
of its own cultural and political milieu, means that Islam itself is little more
than a sociological construct altogether. Hassan admits that its true message
has been manipulated; yet he would
have it evolve according to the cultural, economical and socio-political milieu
of the region under question.
Hassan divides Muslims into those who are “traditionals”
and those who are “liberals” and takes a stand with the liberals. With regard to
gender issues and moral values, he approves of Communism and the West. The key
idea he develops in his book is that Islam is not a monolithic phenomenon but a
construct shaped complexly by the dynamics of culture, history, politics,
geography, and other external and sociological factors.
Overall, while realizing the value of all the work, time
and money employed in developing such a comprehensive and well thought-out
study, and besides appreciating the fact that Hassan did come up with some fresh
and innovative interpretations to the results of his surveys, I feel that the
book in general leaves a lot to be desired in terms of presenting a truly “new
and objective” view.
|