Gallup International has periodically conducted a survey
in the United States. The question asked was: “If your party nominates a female
candidate for president then would you vote her or not?”
What they answered throughout the century is shown in
Table 1.
Table 1 |
Year |
Yes |
No |
1937 |
33 |
64 |
1949 |
48 |
48 |
1958 |
54 |
41 |
1969 |
53 |
40 |
1983 |
80 |
16 |
1997 |
82 |
12 |
Table 1 shows that the American opinion in this matter has
changed significantly over the years. We may say that almost all Americans are
now in favour of a female president. Although, itself, this survey or this
change is not important but the possible candidacy of Elizabeth Dole in 2000 and
Hillary Clinton in 2004 has made it quite popular among them.
This is not the only example that shows the change in
perception of the Americans regarding the additional role of women in society
along with the conventional one. Change has occurred in almost all other
spheres. For example, in 1900, female participation in jobs was 19%. It had
increased to 46% in 1995. See Table 2:
Table 2 |
Year |
Female Job Participation (%) |
1900 |
18.3 |
1920 |
20.4 |
1940 |
24.3 |
1960 |
32.5 |
1980 |
42.0 |
1995 |
46.0 |
Similarly, in 1992, women owned 6.4 million businesses.
20% of the elected persons were women in 1992. Women participation in military
and other departments has also increased considerably.
These changes, in fact, are the result of the feminist
movement launched in the second decade of nineteenth century in the United
States by Francis Wright. The movement touched its peek under the leadership of
Victoria Woodhul. The movement was a reaction against the oppression and
prejudice women faced in those days from men. Men, because of their natural
physical strength, oppressed women in severe manner, while they themselves did
not fulfil the social and economic obligations they had.
Both black population and the women launched their
movements almost simultaneously. Women announced their economical independence
from men. This goal soon diverted to individual liberty. Women’s religious
circles then opposed such independence arguing that this will only make women
more vulnerable to men – who are naturally stronger than them. Ideas of other
side, however, prevailed.
20th century brought new dimensions for this feminist
movement, according to ABCNews “...various experiments were applied.” Flappers
were one of those new experiments. They were young women from elite class who
gave new meanings to the individual liberty or rights as a sequel of feminist
movement. They started wearing suggestive dresses in public places and voiced
for sexual liberty. Their attitude prevailed among other women and became a
trend. Women never then had to ask for such liberties, and it was never needed
to change the constitution to allow all that – first amendment was there to
protect whatever they did. These flappers proved to be the flagship for the
change of the role of women in US society, and hence became a society we now
call United States of America. In countries, where the social structure is not
similar to that of the US, feminist movements are active to make that one.
What did women achieve from the movement? What did they
lose? The answer lies in the statistics.
Women came out of their homes and started working with men
side by side. They also continued their traditional responsibilities like
raising children, household, etc. That naturally increased the burden. They then
looked for day-care centres and, according to an opinion, the recent Littleton
[Denver, Colorado] high school incident is one of the outcomes of that. (See
latest report at
www.gallup.com)
In 1955, the number of working mothers was 27% while in
1984 it was 60%. Thus women got double responsibility, that is, both of work and
home. Therefore whole attitude of the society changed and marriages became
ephemeral. In 1960, female-maintained households were 15% while in 1994 they
were 44%. Please see Table 3:
Table 3 |
Year |
Total households |
Female maintained |
Divorced (%) |
Single (%) |
1960 |
45 million |
4.5 million |
15 |
8 |
1970 |
51 million |
5.5 million |
22 |
11 |
1980 |
59 million |
8.7 million |
35 |
16 |
1994 |
69 million |
12 million |
44* |
23* |
* estimated |
According to Table 3, in 1960, women maintained 4.5
million families; that was 10% of the total US households at that time, it
increased to 17% till 1994. However, on the other hand, in 1994, male-maintained
families were 1 million – 1.5% of total households. Average annual income of men
is 34% more than that of women. This shows that women have 10 times more
responsibilities while are paid almost half than men.
In 1994, 10% of total US families were living below
poverty line. Women maintain 58% of them. The rest is maintained by either men
or both. Similarly 62% of people living below poverty line are women.
Since women started working with men and exposed
themselves in every sphere of life, men found more ways to use their physical
strength.
According to the American Medical Association, the most
rapidly increasing crime in the US is sexual assault that currently is at the
rate of one every 45 seconds. This estimate is based on only 10% to 50% [most
agree on 10%] assaults that are reported.
National Victim Centre says that every year 0.7 million
women are raped. 61% of them are below 18 years. Family members or boy-friends
made 80% of the assaults. According to a survey of 6,159 college students
enrolled at 32 institutions of US, 57% assaults occurred on dates. 54% of the
women surveyed had been victims of some form of sexual abuse. More than one in
four college-aged women had been the victim of rape or attempted rape. 42% of
the victims told no one.
In a survey of male college students, 35% anonymously
admitted that, under certain circumstances, they would commit rape if they
believed they could get away with it. 43% admitted to using coercive behaviour
to have sex. One in 12 admitted to committing acts that met the legal definition
of rape, and 84% of men who committed rape did not label it as rape. 15%
acknowledged that they had committed acquaintance rape, and 11% acknowledged
using physical restraints to force a woman to have sex.
In a survey of high school students, 56% of girls and 76%
of the boys believed forced sex was acceptable under some circumstances. 65% of
the boys and 47% of the girls said it was acceptable for a boy to rape a girl if
they had been dating for more than six months. 51% of the boys and 41% of the
girls said forced sex was acceptable if the boy “spent a lot of money” on the
girl.
Another survey shows that from 1985 to 1994, the number of
female AIDS victims is 3 times more than that of men:
Table 4 |
|
AIDS Victims |
Sex |
1985 |
1990 |
1994 |
Male |
7521 |
36381 |
63361 |
Female |
520 |
4538 |
13423 |
All these figures show that the feminist movement,
unfortunately, has taken women from one form of oppression to another – to a
style of oppression where women seems to be independent but is again being
oppressed. The difference is that the number of oppressors of a woman has
increased. She is now more vulnerable and more accessible. She is alone and
burdened more – and yet, she is paid almost half as men are. That’s all because
this oppression has been named as progress and women are told that their rights
are to do what this form of progress demands. Men are abusing women by making
them a tool for themselves. They use and abuse women and then throw them away.
Women have been commercialized. Their roles as sisters, mothers, wives and
daughters have been changed into models, miss universes, and miss IMF.
Bibliography
1. The 1986
Information Please Almanac, Houghton Fifflin Company, Boston, 1986
2. The World
Almanac and book of Facts 1997, World Almanac Books, Mahwah, New Jersey
3. The
Constitution and American Life by David Thelen, Cornell University Press
4. The World
Book Encyclopaedia, 1988
5.
http://infoplease.lycos.com
6.
http://www.census.gov
_______________ |