Islam and Christianity are the two most important religions
of the world. While Christianity has the largest number of adherents, Islam, as
a religion is more dynamic. The role of religion is so great that it is even
influencing modern scientific and technological advancements. For example, some
modern thinkers are advocating the use of religious slogans and symbols to curb
environmental hazards, because other methods have failed to address the problem
properly.
The role of religion increased in the 20th century as
several movements sprang up in the Muslim world stressing on the role of
religion in politics. The occurrence of the phenomenon of Islamic movements in
the Muslim world was quite astonishing for the West as they were accustomed to
secularism. And due to secularism and democracy, they sought the advancement, of
not only the West but of the entire world community. The difference of
perceptions among the Western and Muslim intelligentsia and political actors led
to controversies between them. These controversies on many occasions led to open
conflict and antagonism between the West and Muslims. The appearance of the
hypothesis of ‘The clash of Civilizations’ further deteriorated the existing
relations between the West and the Muslim World. The grim future has been sensed
by both the Western and Muslim intellectuals and thus from both the sides, there
is a growing feeling for the need to exchange views in order to lessen
apprehension and improve understanding.
The present volume, ‘Islam and the West -- A Dialogue’, is
a serious effort on the part of ‘United Association for Studies and Research’
and ‘American Muslim Foundation’ for initiating roundtable discussions between
the West and the Muslims and presenting it in a book form. The format of all
these discussions was in the form of presentation by the speakers -- all of whom
are Non-Muslim American intellectuals ranging from conservative to liberal, from
diplomats to policy makers, from the academic community to the intelligence
community and media. Each presentation was followed by a frank discussion,
comprising the speaker and the Muslim participants, who had different
backgrounds ranging from Islamic think tanks in America to the Islamic
activists, including one parliamentarian of the Islamic Salvation Front Algeria
that emerged as the winner of the elections in 1993, but was debarred from
assuming power by the military junta.
Certain themes are emerging from these discussions
including the relationship of politics and religion; the positive and negative
aspects of the enlightenment; the degree to which Western and Islamic values may
actually be universal values; the multifarious definitions of democracy by the
West and Muslims and where they conflict with each other; the fact that
conflicts within the West and the Muslim world may be more important than the
conflicts between the West and the East; the problem posed by the politicians in
their systematic tendency to sacrifice the long-term best interests of their
people and country for short term expediency; the suggestion that the real
conflict in the future may be not between the Western and Islamic cultures but
between the secular culture and the religious culture.
The underlying aim of the book is that the West should
understand the Islamic movement and the Muslims should give a thoughtful
consideration to the West. Participants of the roundtable, both Muslims and
Non-Muslim Americans, expressed themselves openly ranging from criticism of the
American policies regarding the Islamic movements by the American Non-Muslims
and to reservations of the Muslim participants about the activities of the
Islamic movements.
Dr Graham Fuller in his talk stated that there is a kind of
near obsession today about Islamic political movements after the Iranian
Revolution in 1979 (p. 27). The West, particularly the USA, ‘heard something
disgusting from the Non-West which they could not imagine in an age when they
are superior in force, wealth, power of media and the power of international
television and the enormous impacts of their culture including food, clothing,
arts, films and amusements’.
Robert G. Newman rejected the thesis that Islamism is now
representing a new ‘World Enemy’ (p. 39). On the question of American policy
towards Algeria, the speaker pointed it out that the US cannot ignore the
interest of one of its allies France, because they need to work with France in
other parts of the world such as Bosnia (p. 43). However, the speaker also
expressed: ‘If fear leads us into the position that we must prevent Islamists
from coming to power by any means, then we are fundamentally perverting our own
ideals. The cost of such policy is too great’ (p. 53).
Dr Stephen C. Pelletiere forwarding his theory that what
the West has widely perceived about the Islamic movements as a radical movement
actually began as a movement of reform (p. 67). He than narrated in detail the
examples of Algeria, Egypt and Palestine. With the exception of the Hizbullāh
(Lebanon) all of the Islamic movements eschewed violence in the beginning. He
suggested that the West should not ignore the fact that religious fundamentalism
is in reality a conservative reaction to over a half century of misrule by
secular regimes (p. 85). However, the ineffective leadership of these movements
failed to overthrow the regimes under assault (p. 88).
Dr Charles Butterworth took the slogans of French
Revolution – ‘Liberty, Equality and Fraternity’ and then discussed it in the
context of the Muslim World. He questioned the Western emphasis on liberty and
their so much criticism on Islam for not being liberal. He asked them whether
that meant not being ‘secular’? The speaker calmed his Westerner friends that in
an Islamic Republic, with respect to liberty—there would be liberty from poverty
and liberty from the oppression of passions. With regard to equality, there
would be equality before God, without destroying a traditional sense of
hierarchies—based on natural phenomena such as gender, age and intelligence.
However, regarding fraternity, the speaker expressed his apprehension that it
will be exclusively for the Muslims.
Dr Michael Collins Dunn in his talk discarded the
impression that the phenomenon of Islamic revivalism is a united global movement
or a monolithic structure (p. 116). As countries differ from each other, the
same is the case with these movements which differ from one another in precise
goals, in tactics and their own view of their role in the existing system. There
is also a diversification of leadership in these movements ranging from the
traditional Ulema to the educated persons. The nature of their support is also
varying from one group to another. The speaker very rightly opined that the
maxim, ‘Islam is the Solution’ is no doubt powerful but it is not in itself a
blueprint for running a state apparatus (p. 121).
Joyce Davis confessed the fact that there are prejudices
against Islam and the Muslims in the American society (p. 154). And this is
because of the stereotypes in the minds of the people which she indicated are
not easy to remove (p. 153). She further emphasized that there are some shared
values and beliefs among the religions of Islam, Christianity and Judaism. No
doubt, the West should support plurality and democracy but it should expand its
definition of democracy. In the Middle East, it is a fact that Islam has become
the primary and most potent language of political protest against the oppressive
dictatorships and military regimes (p. 158).
Dr Antony T. Sullivan talked extensively on the American
society and divided it into three categories: Neo-conservatives, the Paleo-conservatives
and Classical liberals. The last two are capable of entering into a dialogue on
the question of Islam and its role in the modern world. The economic system of
laissez-faire is common in both the communities and Muslims can present the case
on market economy and private ownership as enumerated in the Qur’ān, Hadīth and
propounded by different modern Muslim theorists. On the cultural aspect, both
can cooperate on the question of family life, promotion of moral values in the
society, importance of tradition and sanctity of human life. The speaker then
suggested that continuous contacts and dialogue between the Islamists and the
Westerners would make it more difficult for Professor Samuel Huntington and
others to argue that Islam is the enemy number one after the collapse of
Communism and that the clash of civilizations between a coalition of Islam and
Confucianism and the West is inevitable (p. 120). The speaker gave some
instances in which the Islamists and the Christian Catholics worked together as
in the Cairo Conference on population and World Conference on Women held in
Beijing in 1995.
The Muslim participants while objecting to the Western
policies towards Islam and the Muslims also did not spare the Muslims and
Islamists from criticism. Dr Osman Shinaishin criticized the trend of many of
the Islamic movements in the Muslim world as they are very different from what
Islam truly is (p. 133)
Dispelling the impression of the West that Islam will be
implemented forcefully, Sheikh Alib El Hall, a Muslim leader was quoted as ‘no
one has the right to decide what should be spread and taught in the Muslim
world, and no one will be allowed to gain power by force, even if he would like
to implement the Sharī‘ah and Islamic law’. (p. 231)
There seems to be a fear in the minds of the West that if
the Islamists were allowed to enter into power as government, then they might
not leave it even if they would be rejected by the people in the subsequent
elections. This has been widely circulated as some of the Islamists (though very
few) expressed the opinion that they will not allow the rejection of Islamic
regimes even by a popular vote. The Islamists still have to convince the
Westerners that Islam has a regard for women rights and human dignity. The
debates will go on between Islamists and the secularists on the question of
legitimacy of the existing governments in the Muslim world, and the process of
democratization. The Islamists politics is not going to disappear and it is not
going to be universally triumphant.
The book no doubt is a valuable addition to the scarcity of
literature on the subject and would contribute a lot in bringing together the
West and the East. However, the book does not depict what the title of the book
conveys. All of the discussions about the Islamic political movements are around
the Middle East and North Africa, leaving aside the rest of the Muslim World.
The inclusion of the Muslims and Islamists of the Far East in this dialogue
would be beneficial for the said cause as their relations with the West have
comparatively less antagonistic historical dimensions.
The issue of Israel and Palestine dominated all of the
sessions. The concern of the Islamists on the issue of Palestine is genuine but
is there any possibility of an amicable solution of the problem? And if yes,
then how? Another important question arises that if the issue of Palestine is
solved then can we predict that there will be no other controversy between the
Muslims and the West? Any move towards cordial relations between the West and
the Muslims will be futile unless all of the communities agree on some moral
values. The Abrahamic traditions provide sound grounds for all the three
important actors. It is important that all the communities should concentrate on
certain themes related to the co-existence of one community with another
dominant community. In this respect, the Muslims and Islamists have a greater
responsibility to seek out the answers for certain questions coming up from the
present changing and complex situation due to scientific and technological
developments which affect the entire social life of all the members of the world
community. Does Islam allow Muslims to live peacefully under a non-Muslim
country? An impression has been created by certain people and taken by the
Westerners that Muslims cannot live in minority anywhere in the world and that
it is their aim according to the teachings of their religion to convert the
country to a Dāru’l-Islām (abode of Muslims) even by force. This notion is
greatly perturbing to non-Muslims and thus fears are but natural in their minds.
The printing of the book is of high quality. It has a
beautiful title page depicting the unity of apparently opposite polls in the
background of sunlight. However, there are certain typographical mistakes which
are incomprehensible in a book published in the USA. These mistakes appear on
pages 7, 28, 90, 161, 183, 219, 204 and 241. The book ends with the following
beautiful note:
Without doubt the overdue dialogue between Islam and the
West has begun. Perceived and imagined dichotomies between the two are being
narrowed by shared moral and religious values, and common prayer for a future of
peace, prosperity and justice of all the world’s people. Scholars, Western and
Islamic (some both), have approached one another as equals and have treated
dialogue as a universal good rather than a device for advocacy of special
interests. In such enlightened interaction is hope for a 21st century that will
be a period of Islamic and Western cooperation and not the confrontation that
has dominated the past.
|