An important guiding principle
mentioned in the Qur’ān for regulating the economic life of Muslims in an
equitable manner is that in an Islamic society wealth should not be allowed to
circulate among the rich of the society alone. After announcing that the wealth
Muslims have obtained by way of fay
belongs to Allah and His Prophet (sws), the relatives of the Prophet (sws), the
orphans, and the needy and the wayfarers, the Qur’ān says that this has been
done so that ‘it (wealth) may not concentrate in the hands of those who are rich
among you’ (59:7). In other words it is one of the objectives which the Qur’ān
wants to see achieved that instead of allowing wealth to remain concentrated in
a few hands, it should be made to flow in society as widely as possible so that
the distinction between the rich and the poor can be narrowed as far as is
natural and practicable.
If this verse of the Qur’ān is
carefully considered, on the one hand, it sanctions the existence of rich people
and, on the other, it definitely disallows them from unjustifiably going on
increasing their share of the total wealth of the society. In fact, if the true
spirit of the verse is followed, their share should, if anything, gradually fall
in a society which regulates its affairs according to Qur’ānic guidance.
Islam definitely recognizes
natural economic differences among human beings. However, according to the verse
under consideration, those differences should not be allowed to be the basis of
further expansion of the gulf between the rich and the poor. To put it simply,
any system which results in the rich getting richer because of the peculiar
nature of the system and which allows the poor to remain poor cannot be deemed
Islamically acceptable. In fact, Islam believes in striking at the roots of
inequality rather than merely alleviating some of the symptoms. If, on the
contrary, in an economy all segments of the society experience economic
improvement although the poor much less than the rich, then, according to the
spirit of the verse, such a situation can only be considered less unacceptable;
it is certainly not desirable. Therefore, if the effects of any two economic
policies for the eradication of poverty are similar, it is necessary to prefer
the one which reduces income disparity.
It needs to be understood that
there is a difference between economic progress of an individual attributable to
his hard work and intelligence or good fortune and progress by virtue of a
position of advantage offered to him by the favourable customs and laws of the
society. Whereas, generally speaking, there can be no objection from the Islamic
point of view to the achievements of a person in the former case, undue
advantage in the economic race in the latter case would never be acceptable to
the letter and spirit of Islamic teachings.
|