Tone of the Sūrah and its Relationship
with the Previous one
Some people have regarded this sūrah
to be Madīnan. However, in my opinion, not a single verse of it appears to be
Madīnan much less the whole sūrah. The whole surah has the same tone and
rhythm and a reader clearly feels that it was revealed in one episode.
With regard to its tone, this sūrah
belongs to that category of sūrahs which were revealed at the time of the
Prophet’s Makkan life in which his opponents, in their fury to refute him, had
become adamant on a demand: unless a sign of punishment was shown to them, they
were not ready to accept the fact that if they rejected the call of this new
faith, they would be punished; they were also not willing to accept the fact
that a day was to come when they would encounter eternal punishment and
everlasting humiliation.
Because of this mentality of
stubbornness and obduracy, the verse وَلَقَدْ
يَسَّرْنَا الْقُرْآنَ لِلذِّكْرِ فَهَلْ مِن مُّدَّكِرٍ
was repeated in the previous sūrah. Now in this sūrah the
verse فَبِأَيِّ آلَاء رَبِّكُمَا تُكَذِّبَانِ
is repeated again and again. Obviously this style of directing attention to one
specific thing is adopted when either the addressee is so stubborn that he is
not ready to accept anything against his wishes or he is such a dunce that
unless he is spoon fed and called to attention on each and every point he cannot
be expected to understand any thing rational.
Keeping the mentality of the addressee
and his temperament in consideration is essential for any discourse. If a
speaker is not able to keep this in consideration, his discourse will not be in
accordance with the situation neither will it be eloquent. Those who have no
idea of these requirements of a discourse are unable to judge the positive
aspects and subtleties of such a discourse. They regard the repetition of a
verse to be a needless recurrence, which obviously is a defect of the discourse.
Consequently, some foolish people have objected on this recurrence found in this
sūrah. The fact is that if they understand the nature of people who this
sūrah
addresses, they will exclaim that at every instance the recurring verse is fully
embedded in its context the way a pearl is embedded in a ring.
In Sūrah Qamar, the obdurate people of
the Quraysh were told to learn a lesson from messengers and the history of their
people; why are they adamant to believe only when they see the scourge with
their very eyes; it is a great favour of the Almighty that to educate and remind
them He has revealed a book which is very appropriate for this objective. Now in
this sūrah, this subject is brought up in a new and unique way. They are told
that it is the merciful nature of the Almighty because of which He has taught
them the Qur’ān. It was a requirement of their nature that for this purpose only
the Qur’ān be revealed. If He has taught them the ability of speech, it means
that they can understand and make others understand as well. It is a right of
this exalted ability that instead of the lash of punishment it be made the means
of their education. However, it is their misfortune, that instead of benefiting
from God’s mercy and favour, they are hastily demanding a new sign. If they want
a sign, why do not they deliberate on the signs of the heavens and the earth and
the world found inside man and that outside him – all of which they observe
daily and which teach them the same lesson which the Qur’ān is teaching? What is
the need for some new sign in their presence? After this each and every sign of
the heavens and earth is pinpointed and the attention of these obdurate people
is directed towards each of them. What more signs do they want? Alas! How many
of their Lord’s signs will they deny?
Some Difficulties of this Sūrah
As far as the difficulties of the sūrah
relating to the style, language and interpretation are concerned, they shall
inshallāh be dealt with under the relevant verses of the sūrah. However, there
are two things which I would like to clarify here in the introduction so that
explaining them again and again is not required. The first of these relates to
the research in the word آلَاء
and the second of these relates to the nature of address in the verse:
فَبِأَيِّ آلَاء رَبِّكُمَا تُكَذِّبَانِ.
The word آلَاء
is the plural of إِلْىٌ and
ألىً and
إلىً. All the leading
lexicographers and exegetes regard it to mean “favours”. However, my mentor,
Hamīd al-Dīn al-Farāhī in his Mufradāt al-Qur’ān has differed with this opinion.
In his opinion, this word does not merely come in the meaning referred to above;
it has a wider connotation. He begins his discussion on this issue with the
following words:
Even though there is a consensus that
the word آلَاء means
“favours” however, the Qur’ān and classical Arabic literature does not support
this claim. It is evident through a comprehensive analysis of classical Arabic
poetry that its real meaning is feats, miracles, marvels of nature and wisdom.
However, a greater part of God’s miracles and marvels is based on His signs of
mercy. For this reason, people concluded that the real meaning of
آلَاء is “favours”.
In this regard, al-Farāhī has also presented his
interpretation of a narrative attributed to Ibn ‘Abbās (rta) in which he
mentions that this word means “favours”. He says that our illustrious scholars
of the past would answer a question posed to them keeping in view the occasion
and background. They would specify that at a particular instance the word had
been used in a particular meaning
After these introductory sentences he has presented
corroboratory evidence in support of his view from the works of poets belonging
to the age of jāhiliyyah as well as from certain Hamāsī poets. The poets from
the age of jāhiliyyah include: Tarfah, Mayyah bint Darār, Muhalhal, Rabi‘ah ibn
Maqrūm, Ajda‘ al-Hamadānī, Fudālah ibn Zayd and Khansā’. It is evident from this
material that in the works of famous poets of the age of jāhiliyyah – poets
whose poetry is regarded to be a source of language and morphology, this word is
not merely used to mean “favours”; it has a much wider connotation that includes
favours, power, majesty, signs, miracles, marvels, feats and other similar
connotations.
It is a source of great pleasure for me that the
translators and exegetes of these times are referring to the research of Imām
Farāhī (even though without properly citing him). However, since the works of
Imām Farāhī are in Arabic, people who do not have a strong grasp of it are
misled. It is evident from this discussion that he does not contest that the
meaning of this word is “favours”; however, he does contest that this is its
only meaning.
All the exegetes are unanimous that the verse فَبِأَيِّ
آلَاء رَبِّكُمَا تُكَذِّبَانِ addresses both man and
jinn. The Qur’ān itself has explained this in various styles in this sūrah.
However, two questions arise here. First, just as the message of the Qur’ān is
meant for man, is it also for the jinn? If the answer to this question is in the
affirmative, then a further question arises: Did the Prophet Muhammad (sws)
conclusively convey the truth from the Almighty to the jinn also just as he did
to his people?
The answer to this question, in my opinion, is that
keeping in view the principles set forth by the Almighty in the Qur’ān regarding
sending His prophets and the nature of their responsibility in disseminating
their message, it is difficult to say that the Prophet (sws) was also sent
towards the jinn and that just as he had conclusively communicated the truth to
his people, he had also done so to the jinn. It is mentioned in the Qur’ān in
various styles that the prophet sent to a nation is from among them; he speaks
in their tongue and is the best representative of their nature; by setting an
example, he encourages the good in people and discourages the evil in them and
for this reason his life becomes an example for every person. It is obvious that
none of these things is possible for the Prophet (sws) viz a viz the jinn.
Moreover, it is also known that he has not informed us of
any efforts he made in calling the jinn to faith and in reforming and
instructing them just as he did so in the case of his people. What at most can
be claimed is that he did meet a group of jinn once or twice or that a group of
jinn had heard the Qur’ān from the Prophet (sws) and had expressed their liking
for it. It is mentioned earlier in Sūrah Ahqāf and a mention is coming up in
Sūrah Jinn that a group of jinn had heard a few verses of the Qur’ān from the
blessed tongue of the Prophet (sws) and liked them. At these places too, it is
specified that the Prophet (sws) did not directly come to know of this liking;
he was informed of it by the Almighty. Such chance meetings are obviously not
enough for the dissemination of a message and its conclusive communication which
every prophet and messenger did for his people and for which purpose a messenger
is in fact sent to his people. If the jinn are addressed in this way in some
places in the Qur’ān, it is not because they are its direct addressees; the
actual reason, in my opinion, is that just as when the clouds of mercy send down
rain which drenches both dry and damp areas, in a similar manner, the mercy of
the Qur’ān at times extends to the jinn – specially in those matters of
principle which are common between them and man. The concepts of monotheism, the
day of judgement, the reward and punishment which will take place on it, the
truth, justice and other similar things are absolutely the same in both these
creatures. If there is a difference, it relates to those areas which pertain to
peculiarities of genre of the two. The real objective of this sūrah, as has been
discussed earlier, is to remind unmindful people of the signs of power, wisdom,
mercy and providence of God and to jolt and awaken them. For this reason,
besides addressing the unmindful among mankind, it also addresses the unmindful
jinn. This awe and dread of the discourse, as a result, has spread to the whole
world.
It is possible that in the light of this discussion a
question arise in someone’s mind: Just as prophet and messengers have been sent
to mankind from among them, similarly prophets and messengers from among the
jinn must have been sent to them and would have taken up the responsibility of
reforming and instructing them in their language and keeping in view the
characteristics of their genre. I accept the responsibility of this inference.
It is in complete accordance with sense and reason and also in absolute harmony
with the practice of God regarding His prophets and messengers as enshrined in
the Qur’ān at many instances. If the jinn like mankind are creatures who have
been given the freedom to exercise their will and who will be held accountable
by God for their deeds and will be accordingly rewarded and punished, then it is
essential as per the practice of God for their guidance, prophets and messengers
must have been sent to them and it is also essential that they must have called
them to the truth in their own language. In my opinion, there is not a single
verse in the Qur’ān which goes against this inference. On the contrary, there
are various verses which clearly go in its favour.
In Sūrah Baqarah, where the incident of Adam and Satan is
mentioned, both of them are addressed at the end in the following words:
قُلْنَا
اهْبِطُوا مِنْهَا جَمِيعًا فَإِمَّا يَأْتِيَنَّكُمْ مِنِّي هُدًى فَمَنْ تَبِعَ
هُدَايَ فَلَا خَوْفٌ عَلَيْهِمْ وَلَا هُمْ يَحْزَنُونَ (٢:
٣٧)
We ordered: “Go [out] from here; then if ever comes to you any guidance from Me,
then whosoever follows My guidance will have no fear, nor shall they grieve.”
(2:37)
In the above mentioned verse, just as the Almighty has
promised Adam and his progeny that He will send guidance to them, He has also
made this very promise with Iblīs and His progeny.
Similarly, it is clearly stated in Sūrah An‘ām that
messengers were also sent to the jinn:
يَامَعْشَرَ
الْجِنِّ وَالإِنسِ أَلَمْ يَأْتِكُمْ رُسُلٌ مِنْكُمْ يَقُصُّونَ عَلَيْكُمْ
آيَاتِي وَيُنذِرُونَكُمْ لِقَاءَ يَوْمِكُمْ هَذَا قَالُوا شَهِدْنَا عَلَى
أَنفُسِنَا وَغَرَّتْهُمْ الْحَيَاةُ الدُّنْيَا وَشَهِدُوا عَلَى أَنفُسِهِمْ
أَنَّهُمْ كَانُوا كَافِرِينَ (٢:
١٣٠)
“O Jinn and men! Did there not come to you messengers of
your own who proclaimed to you My revelations and warned you of this day of
resurrection?” They will reply: “We bear witness against our own souls.” And
indeed, the life of this world deceived them and they themselves testified
against their own selves that they had been disbelievers. (6:130)
The coherence in this sūrah is very evident. The
sūrah
begins with the declaration that the Qur’ān is a manifestation of the
graciousness of the Almighty. The Almighty created man and specially blessed him
with the power of speech and comprehension. These grand favours and abilities
entail that man should be taught and educated with the most grand heavenly work
–the Qur’ān – and not through torment and punishment. It is the extreme
misfortune of those who, instead of seeking guidance from it, demand to see the
promised doom.
After this, the various signs in the world around man and
those within him are pointed to and two of the Almighty’s creations – men and
jinn– are repeatedly warned and jolted to reflect on them and asked how many
such signs would they deny.
First and foremost are mentioned those signs and
manifestations which point to the fact that the Almighty greatly cherishes
justice and does not approve anything contrary to justice and equity at all in
the world He has created.
These are followed by those signs which indicate that the
tremendous and extremely vast system of sustenance which the Almighty has
established on the earth entails that man shall one day be held accountable for
the profound blessings he has been given. Those who deserve to be rewarded shall
be rewarded, and those who deserve to be punished shall be punished.
A reference is then made to the fact that it is the
Almighty who has created men and jinn from fire and clay and He can easily
create them a second time. There is no difficulty for Him in this regard.
This whole Universe is under His control; He is the Lord
of the East and the West. Whatever rises, rises with His permission and whatever
sets, sets with His permission.
After this, it is asserted that the conflicting elements
in the universe are in harmony with one another to fulfil a greater purpose
which is over and above their creation. This bears witness to the fact that a
sovereign will is dominant over these elements which creates harmony between
them and uses them for the collective welfare of the universe. If this were not
so, the universe would have been destroyed by a clash between its conflicting
elements. That it is surviving is ample testimony to the fact that a single
supreme and omnipotent power controls it.
An indication is then made that Allah alone is immortal
and all the rest are mortal.
Next it is expressed that all except the Almighty are
needy and He is the only one who fulfils their needs. The foolish who ask from
others actually receive from Him alone.
An affirmation is then made of the fact that the Day
wherein accountability of deeds shall take place is certain to come and on that
Day no one –neither man nor jinn– will be able to run away from the Almighty’s
grasp. On that Day, no evidence will be needed to convict a criminal as his
forehead will bear witness to his sins. He will then be grabbed by his forehead
and feet and flung into Hell.
Next, the features and characteristics of the Paradise
which the muqarrabīn shall receive are delineated, followed by the features and
characteristics of the Paradise which the ashāb al-yamīn will be blessed with.
Section I (Verses 1-30)
بسم الله
الرحمن الرحيم
الرَّحْمَنُ
(١) عَلَّمَ الْقُرْآنَ (٢) خَلَقَ الْإِنسَانَ (٣) عَلَّمَهُ الْبَيَانَ (٤)
الشَّمْسُ وَالْقَمَرُ بِحُسْبَانٍ (٥) وَالنَّجْمُ وَالشَّجَرُ يَسْجُدَانِ (٦)
وَالسَّمَاء رَفَعَهَا وَوَضَعَ الْمِيزَانَ (٧) أَلَّا تَطْغَوْا فِي الْمِيزَانِ
(٨) وَأَقِيمُوا الْوَزْنَ بِالْقِسْطِ وَلَا تُخْسِرُوا الْمِيزَانَ (٩)
وَالْأَرْضَ وَضَعَهَا لِلْأَنَامِ (١٠) فِيهَا فَاكِهَةٌ وَالنَّخْلُ ذَاتُ
الْأَكْمَامِ (١١) وَالْحَبُّ ذُو الْعَصْفِ وَالرَّيْحَانُ (١٢) فَبِأَيِّ آلَاء
رَبِّكُمَا تُكَذِّبَانِ (١٣) خَلَقَ الْإِنسَانَ مِن صَلْصَالٍ كَالْفَخَّارِ (١٤)
وَخَلَقَ الْجَانَّ مِن مَّارِجٍ مِّن نَّارٍ (١٥) فَبِأَيِّ آلَاء رَبِّكُمَا
تُكَذِّبَانِ (١٦) رَبُّ الْمَشْرِقَيْنِ وَرَبُّ الْمَغْرِبَيْنِ (١٧) فَبِأَيِّ
آلَاء رَبِّكُمَا تُكَذِّبَانِ (١٨) مَرَجَ الْبَحْرَيْنِ يَلْتَقِيَانِ (١٩)
بَيْنَهُمَا بَرْزَخٌ لَّا يَبْغِيَانِ (٢٠) فَبِأَيِّ آلَاء رَبِّكُمَا
تُكَذِّبَانِ (٢١) يَخْرُجُ مِنْهُمَا اللُّؤْلُؤُ وَالْمَرْجَانُ (٢٢) فَبِأَيِّ
آلَاء رَبِّكُمَا تُكَذِّبَانِ (٢٣) وَلَهُ الْجَوَارِ الْمُنشَآتُ فِي الْبَحْرِ
كَالْأَعْلَامِ (٢٤) فَبِأَيِّ آلَاء رَبِّكُمَا تُكَذِّبَانِ (٢٥) كُلُّ مَنْ
عَلَيْهَا فَانٍ (٢٦) وَيَبْقَى وَجْهُ رَبِّكَ ذُو الْجَلَالِ وَالْإِكْرَامِ (٢٧)
فَبِأَيِّ آلَاء رَبِّكُمَا تُكَذِّبَانِ (٢٨) يَسْأَلُهُ مَن فِي السَّمَاوَاتِ
وَالْأَرْضِ كُلَّ يَوْمٍ هُوَ فِي شَأْنٍ (٢٩) فَبِأَيِّ آلَاء رَبِّكُمَا
تُكَذِّبَانِ (٣٠)
In the name of God, the Most-Gracious, the Ever-Merciful.
It is the Merciful who has taught the Qur’ān. He created
man; taught him speech. (1-4)
The sun and the moon pursue their ordered course. And the
stars and the trees also bow down in adoration. And He raised high the sky and
placed the balance in it so that you too should not transgress that balance. And
weigh justly and do not measure less. (5-9)
And He laid out the earth for His creatures. In it are
fruits, dates in coverings, chaff-covered grain and scented flowers – So O Jinn
and Men! So which of your Lord’s blessings would you deny? (10-13)
He created man from the potter’s clay, and the jinn from
the flame of fire. So which of your Lord’s powers would you deny? (14-16)
He alone is the Lord of both borders of the East and He
alone is the Lord of both borders of the West. So which of your Lord’s majesties
would you deny? (17-18)
He has let loose the two oceans: they meet one another.
Yet between them is a barrier which they cannot cross. So which of your Lord’s
miracles would you deny? (19-21)
Pearls and corals come out from both. So which of your
Lord’s wonders would you deny? (22-23)
In His control are ships which are like mountains rising
above the ocean. So which of your Lord’s marvels would you deny? (24-25)
All that lives on the earth is destined to die and only
the glorious and majestic person of your Lord will abide forever. So which of
your Lord’s majesties would you deny? (26-28)
And whatever is in the heavens and the earth ask from Him.
At all timest, His majesty has a newer manifestation. So which of your Lord’s
majesties would you deny? (29-30)
Explanation
الرَّحْمَنُ
(١) عَلَّمَ الْقُرْآنَ (٢)
The implication of this verse is that it is a special
favour of God that He has revealed a thing as blessed and merciful as the Qur’ān
for their instruction. Had He wanted, He could have sent punishment as per their
demand; however, out of His great mercy He blessed them with a benevolent
scripture so that they could read and understand it and in the light of its
guidance reform their misguided concepts and deeds. As a result, they would be
able to succeed in this world a well as in the next. In short, when the Merciful
God has blessed them with His mercy, why do they demand His punishment instead
of demanding His mercy.
خَلَقَ
الْإِنسَانَ (٣) عَلَّمَهُ الْبَيَانَ (٤)
The implication of these verses is that besides God’s
mercy, the creation of man and his abilities also require that instead of
torment, a scripture of guidance be sent down. God created man and taught him
speech. This power of speech bears witness that the Creator has made him into a
sane and sensible person. He has the ability to hear and understand things and
is able to distinguish good from evil. He can communicate this to others also
and make them understand as well. When he is blessed with these multifarious
abilities, then this clearly shows that God wants that He teach Him through
speech and not through the lash which teaches animals.
Here it needs to be appreciated that the ability of speech
given to man bears witness to other multifarious abilities found in him. A
natural corollary of the faculty of speech is that man has intellect, he can
derive principles from components and vice versa and simulate components from
principles. He has the ability to reason, to infer and to form opinions. For
this very reason, Aristotle regards this ability of man as one which
distinguishes him from animals. If he is devoid of this ability, then he is not
fit to be called a human being; he is merely an animal which walks on two legs.
It is evident from this fact that those who, instead of understanding a reality
on the basis of reasoning, insist that they will only believe in it after seeing
it are no less than animals even though they may be living in grand houses.
الشَّمْسُ
وَالْقَمَرُ بِحُسْبَانٍ (٥) وَالنَّجْمُ وَالشَّجَرُ يَسْجُدَانِ (٦)
Attention is drawn to the signs found in this universe; if
signs are required to substantiate the warnings of the Qur’ān, then why should
people wait for a new sign; they should just observe the heavens above them;
they should see how the sun and the moon adhere to their paths with such
punctuality and discipline. There is never even a discrepancy of a second.
People should also see how these heavenly bodies are observing the limits set
for them by the Almighty. Never does the sun exceed its ordained path to intrude
into the path ordained for the moon nor does the moon intrude into the path
ordained for the sun (See, the Qur’ān, 36:40). Does not this sign every day
teach man the lesson that if the Creator of this universe has subjected such
grand creations as the sun and the moon to certain laws, why will He not subject
man to His commands? If man breaks these laws and dares spread anarchy in this
world, why would He not punish him? It is most befitting for man to abide by the
laws He has implemented in every nook and corner of this universe.
After mentioning how the sun and the moon abide by the
limits ordained for them and which in religious parlance is called taqwā,
mentioned in the verse وَالنَّجْمُ وَالشَّجَرُ
يَسْجُدَانِ is the prostration of the stars of the
heavens and trees of the earth: they bow down before their Creator and through
this practice of theirs call upon man that he too must not be rebellious to his
Creator and should worship and bow down before Him in full obedience.
The prostration of the stars and the trees is explained at
various places of this tafsīr. Readers can look it up. Citing it here would only
needlessly lengthen the discussion.
Some people have interpreted the word
النَّجْمُ to mean things like small
plants, thorny trees and creepers. Probably, they were not able to understand
the purpose of mentioning trees with stars and for this reason they had to make
this far-fetched interpretation. The fact of the matter is that there exists
great commonality in the attributes of the two. The Qur’ān has mentioned at many
places the prostration of both the stars and the trees in various styles. It is
because of this harmony between the two that they are mentioned together in this
verse as well. It shows how the heavens and the earth are in harmony with one
another: the Creator of both is the same before Whom the stars of the heavens
and the trees of the earth prostrate. It should remain in consideration that
Mujāhid, Qatādah and Hasan interpret the word
النَّجْمُ in its conventional meaning ie stars. Ibn
Kathīr too supports their view and has cited the following verse as
corroboratory evidence:
أَلَمْ تَرَ
أَنَّ اللَّهَ يَسْجُدُ لَهُ مَن فِي السَّمَاوَاتِ وَمَن فِي الْأَرْضِ
وَالشَّمْسُ وَالْقَمَرُ وَالنُّجُومُ وَالْجِبَالُ وَالشَّجَرُ وَالدَّوَابُّ
(١٨:٢٢)
Do you not see that those in the heavens and the earth,
the sun and the moon and the stars, the mountains and the trees, the beasts, and
countless men – all prostrate before God? (22:18)
وَالسَّمَاء
رَفَعَهَا وَوَضَعَ الْمِيزَانَ (٧)
After directing attention to some prominent signs of the
heavens, attention is directed towards the heavens themselves: how the Almighty
has raised this unfathomable roof without any columns. No one can have an idea
of its vastness. In spite of this immeasurable expanse, such is the nature of
the balance found in it that no one can point out any fissure or fault in it. At
another place, it is stated:
خَلَقَ
السَّمَاوَاتِ بِغَيْرِ عَمَدٍ تَرَوْنَهَا وَأَلْقَى فِي الْأَرْضِ رَوَاسِيَ أَن
تَمِيدَ بِكُمْ (١٠:٣١)
He raised the heavens without visible pillars, and set
firm mountains on the earth lest it should fall away with you to one side.
(31:10)
In Sūrah Mulk, the words are:
الَّذِي خَلَقَ
سَبْعَ سَمَاوَاتٍ طِبَاقًا مَّا تَرَى فِي خَلْقِ الرَّحْمَنِ مِن تَفَاوُتٍ
فَارْجِعِ الْبَصَرَ هَلْ تَرَى مِن فُطُورٍ ثُمَّ ارْجِعِ الْبَصَرَ كَرَّتَيْنِ
يَنقَلِبْ إِلَيْكَ الْبَصَرُ خَاسِأً وَهُوَ حَسِيرٌ (٦٧:
٣-٤)
He Who created seven heavens one above the other. You will
not find any fault with what has been created by the Most Gracious. Look about:
can you see any flaw? Look again and again. Your look will come back to you worn
out and overcome. (67:3-4)
It is evident from the words
بَغَيْرِ عَمَدٍ تَرَوْنَهَا that in order to maintain
balance in the roof of the sky, the Almighty has used gravitational columns
which cannot be observed.
أَلَّا
تَطْغَوْا فِي الْمِيزَانِ (٨)
The implication is that the placement of a balance in the
sky by the Creator, without which it cannot stay in its shape, informs us of the
temperament and nature of the Creator: He wants that man too in his circle of
authority should give due regard to balance, justice and equity; he should not
create any disturbance in this system otherwise the whole system of sustenance
will be inflicted with disorder. The implication is that it is to this system of
justice and fairness the Qur’ān is calling man – the system of which testimony
is found in every nook and corner of the sky spread above. The Qur’ān is warning
people that if they transgress the bounds of justice by being blinded by their
arrogance and rebelliousness, they will bear its punishment not only in this
world but also in the Hereafter. Why is it that they are not being able to
understand such a clear thing of which testimony is borne by every nook and
corner of the heavens and the earth? Why are they looking for the lash of
punishment by disregarding all these telling signs found around them?
وَأَقِيمُوا
الْوَزْنَ بِالْقِسْطِ وَلَا تُخْسِرُوا الْمِيزَانَ (٩)
The verse above mentioned a principle. Now in this verse
an everyday reality which is based on this principle is brought to notice: When
the God below whose sky’s roof they live owns the balance and loves justice,
they too should not lead the life of dishonesty and deceit; they should weigh
and measure with full honesty and not weigh less. While commenting on the
anecdote of the Prophet Shu‘ayb’s people, I have alluded to the fact that
weighing and measuring less is not just an isolated evil: it is a horrible sign
of the disorder that prevails in a society. A further aspect which is
highlighted here is that this evil is in fact against the system of balance and
justice on which the Almighty has created the heavens and the earth. If a people
accept this disorder, then it means that it is after razing the very foundation
on which the Almighty has built this world. Obviously, the Almighty will never
bear such people in the world He has created.
Here another thing which is worthy of consideration is
that the same thing has been stated in a positive and a negative way. A
deliberation on the Qur’ān reveals that this style is adopted at instances when
not obeying the real directive can lead to very dangerous consequences. It is
evident from this that justly weighing and measuring is a directive which has
great significance. By its nature, it is a corollary of the system of justice on
which the Almighty has created this world. It is also evident from this that a
nation which disrupts and disobeys this directive creates disorder in the whole
society.
وَالْأَرْضَ
وَضَعَهَا لِلْأَنَامِ (١٠) فِيهَا فَاكِهَةٌ وَالنَّخْلُ ذَاتُ الْأَكْمَامِ (١١)
وَالْحَبُّ ذُو الْعَصْفِ وَالرَّيْحَانُ (١٢)
After directing attention towards the grand manifestations
of God found in the heavens, attention is now drawn to the resources of
providence found in the earth. The word used for the heavens is
رَفَعَ and in contrast the word
وَضَعَ is very aptly used
for the earth. The implication is that the heavens were raised high like a roof
and the earth was spread out like a floor so that this arrangement could become
a comfortable abode for His creatures. Moreover, just as the heavens were decked
with lamps of the sun, the moon and the stars so that this house was provided
with light and heat, similarly various types of fruit, grain and flowers were
provided so that its residents could obtain their sustenance from them and they
satisfy their taste-buds and the flowers become a means of providing them with
sweet scent and scenic beauty.
Here besides grain, flowers and fruits are specially
mentioned to point to the fact that the Almighty has not merely provided man
fodder to fill his belly, He has also catered for his aesthetic taste, for his
proclivity towards delicacies and for his desire for embellishment. All this
does not bear evidence to His mere providence, it bears witness to the elaborate
nature of His providence. Similarly, the attribute ذُو
الْعَصْفِ which qualifies
الْحَبُّ and the attribute
ذَاتُ الْأَكْمَامِ which qualifies
النَّخْلُ show His great favour to
His creatures. In other words, He has not just tossed grain and fruit towards
man; He has elaborately packed each and every grain and fruit in an amazing
manner. Obviously, this elaborate arrangement has been made so that man
recognizes the obligation he owes to God’s sustenance and favours, remains
thankful to Him and while leading his life always keeps in consideration the
fact that He who has made all this arrangement without man being entitled to it
in any way will not let him go scot-free. He will bring about a day in which man
is held accountable for his deeds.
Here an important point relating to
رَّيْحَانُ is worth mentioning.
Some people have interpreted it to mean leaves; however, this word has not been
used in this meaning in Arabic nor is there any occasion for it to be used here
in this meaning. It seems that these people were confounded by the mention of
flowers with grain though there is no connection between the two. This led them
to this bizarre interpretation of the word whereas there is a particular reason
for this mention, as I have explained above.
فَبِأَيِّ
آلَاء رَبِّكُمَا تُكَذِّبَانِ (١٣)
This verse will occur repeatedly ahead, and it is the most
important verse of the sūrah. For this reason, I have explained the meaning of
آلَاء in the introduction to
this sūrah as well as the nature of the address to man and jinn found in this
verse. However, I will explain one thing here: there is a special reason for
mentioning here the rejecters among the jinn with the rejecters among the
Quraysh: this campaign of rejection had gained great impetus and the devils
among men and jinn had joined hands and were trying their best to defeat the
call of the truth. For this reason, the Almighty has addressed them directly and
has rebuked them and also challenged them, as will become evident from later
verses, that in spite of their profound efforts the true call shall prevail and
progress. I have already explained in the introduction to this sūrah that it was
revealed in that phase of the Makkan period in which the Quraysh were at the
peak of their obduracy and hostility. Obviously, in that phase, they must have
been supported with special help from the devils among the jinn. The situation
required that both these creatures be addressed.
Expressing gratitude on favours to someone who has granted
these favours and having a sense of accountability on the providence of God are
natural requirements of human nature. A person who benefits from the favours of
God but does not acknowledge that as a result he owes some obligation to Him or
that he will be held accountable for them shows through this attitude that he
denies all these favours. The Qur’ān has rebuked the Quraysh and the jinn who
behave similarly on this very denial: on every people before them they can
witness the favours of their Lord which remind them (ie. the Quraysh and the
jinn) of a day of accountability; however, they are adamantly denying them; so
which of the favours and majesties of their Lord will they deny?
خَلَقَ
الْإِنسَانَ مِن صَلْصَالٍ كَالْفَخَّارِ (١٤) وَخَلَقَ الْجَانَّ مِن مَّارِجٍ
مِّن نَّارٍ (١٥) فَبِأَيِّ آلَاء رَبِّكُمَا تُكَذِّبَانِ (١٦)
These verses by reminding man and jinn of their creation
direct their attention to their re-creation: they should not remain under the
misconception that their Lord is unable to recreate them after creating them
once, and so the issue of a day of accountability is not possible; they should
remember that the very material from which He created them is available to Him
in full quantity and God’s ability to create also exists just as it existed when
He created them the first time; so if they cannot deny their first creation,
they also do not have any reason to deny their re-creation.
The word صَلْصَال
refers to pure mud and فَخَّارِ
refers to mud which becomes dry like a potsherd. All the phases through which
human life passes until it reaches its culmination in the form of a human being
are referred to in the Qur’ān at various places. At one instance, it is said
that man is created from a fluid; at another, mud is referred to and, at some
others, smelly kneaded clay is alluded to. Similarly, at some places dry mud is
mentioned. The final phase mentioned is that from a drop of sperm man’s
offspring is initiated. These are the evolutionary stages of human life which
have already been explained in verse twenty six of Sūrah Hijr. The purpose of
mentioning them is to make man observe within his own self the grandeur, power
and wisdom of God so that he is able to comprehend that it is God’s majesty
which extracted him from fluid and mire and then nourished him in the dry and
moderate climate of plateaus and then gradually bestowed him a new shape and set
up a system in which he could continue to produce offspring. The objective of
stating all these facts is to obviously prove that the man’s existence – which
the Almighty caused to pass through such lengthy processes which culminated in
his present form – cannot be purposeless. Simultaneously, another objective is
to show that the all-knowing and all-wise God Who can create man from a cell
formed from mire can do everything; nothing is beyond Him.
The word مَّارِجٍ
in وَخَلَقَ الْجَانَّ مِن مَّارِجٍ مِّن نَّارٍ
means “flame” which is the essence of fire. Just as man is
created from the essence and substance of mud, in a similar manner, the jinn
have been created from the substance of fire. Their phases of creation are not
mentioned in detail in the Qur’ān. The reason for this is that these phases are
of an entirely different nature comprehending which would have been difficult
for man.
After this occurs the repetitive verse which has already
been explained above. Here it would mean that when they observe these majesties
and manifestations of power and wisdom in their own existence, why then do they
regard it to be far-fetched that God will create them again for their
accountability; how many more signs of God will they deny and how many new ones
will they demand?
رَبُّ
الْمَشْرِقَيْنِ وَرَبُّ الْمَغْرِبَيْنِ (١٧) فَبِأَيِّ آلَاء رَبِّكُمَا
تُكَذِّبَانِ (١٨)
God is the Lord of the East and the West. Neither is there
anyone outside His dominion nor does anyone have a share in it. He alone is the
owner of all the East and the West. Not an inch of His territory from the
heavens and earth is under the control of some else so that he can save the
residents of this territory from God’s grasp. In Sūrah Ma‘ārij, this subject is
discussed in the following words: فَلَا أُقْسِمُ
بِرَبِّ الْمَشَارِقِ وَالْمَغَارِبِ إِنَّا لَقَادِرُونَ عَلَى أَن نُّبَدِّلَ
خَيْرًا مِّنْهُمْ وَمَا نَحْنُ بِمَسْبُوقِينَ (٧٠:
٤٠-٤١)
(Nay! I swear by the Lord who is the Master of all the
vastness of the East and the West that We can create them in a better form and
We are not powerless in this regard, (70:40-41)).
Generally, our exegetes are of the opinion that the duals
مَشْرِقَيْنِ and
مَغْرِبَيْنِ refer to the east and
west of the winters and the summer; this however is merely unnatural. The Qur’ān
has used these words in the singular, dual and plural and in all these three
forms there is not much difference as far as the meaning is concerned. In the
case of dual, the objective is to point to both edges and in the case of plural,
the objective is to point to their immeasurable vastness. Examples of such usage
of the dual and the plural can be seen in the previous volumes of this tafsīr.
After this occurs the repetitive verse; such is power and
majesty of God that both East and West are subservient to Him. If they think
that the warning sounded by Him are baseless threats, then how many of God’s
majesties will they deny?
مَرَجَ
الْبَحْرَيْنِ يَلْتَقِيَانِ (١٩) بَيْنَهُمَا بَرْزَخٌ لَّا يَبْغِيَانِ (٢٠)
فَبِأَيِّ آلَاء رَبِّكُمَا تُكَذِّبَانِ (٢١)
Stated here is an argument in favour of God’s
tawhīd viz a
viz the harmony found between conflicting elements of nature. There seems an
apparent conflict and clash in every part of this universe eg the rising and
setting of heavenly bodies, the night and the day, the winter and the summer
which should not lead a person to think that there exist different intentions
and forces in this universe. If a person looks deep into these phenomena, he
will find that in every discord exists a deep concord and harmony. Every object
together with its opposite comes together to serve a greater cause. This bears
witness to the fact that there is a single intention and will which prevails in
this universe which wisely uses all the opposing elements of this universe for
its collective benefit. The Almighty lets loose two seas. One of them is bitter
sour and the other is sweet. Both strike one another but He puts an invisible
curtain between them so that they do meet one another and also remain separate
in their own nature. The sweet water does not become sour and the sour water
does not become sweet. It is evident from this that people who were misled by
the apparent conflict between elements and regard this universe to be a place of
different wills and intentions and then fashioned their own deities according to
their own concepts did not observe the great harmony which is found in every
discord and which is the greatest argument of tawhīd.
Then occurs the repetitive verse. The implication is that
if even after these signs they are under the misconception that if God seizes
them, their deities will save them, then which of God’s signs will they deny?
يَخْرُجُ
مِنْهُمَا اللُّؤْلُؤُ وَالْمَرْجَانُ (٢٢) فَبِأَيِّ آلَاء رَبِّكُمَا
تُكَذِّبَانِ (٢٣)
This verse points to a common collective benefit which is
obtained in spite of this discord: both produce pearls and corals.
Some exegetes have raised the question that pearls and
corals only come out of bitter water, while the Qur’ān has claimed here that
they come out of both types of water. In my opinion, our exegetes have made a
baseless claim. I am citing below the relevant portion from the entry “pearl”
found in the Encylopaedia Britannica. It will become evident from it that pearls
and corals come out from sweet water as well:
Freshwater mussels in the temperate zone of the Northern
Hemisphere have produced pearls of great value. The freshwater pearls of the US
have come principally from the Mississippi river. Pearling has declined greatly
in Great Britain, but pearls from the Scottish rivers and from the Conway river
in Northern Wales were once in great demand. Pearling is still a carefully
fostered industry in central Europe, and the forest streams of Bavaria, in
particular, are the source of choice pearls. Freshwater pearling in China has
been known before 1000 BC.
Even if it is supposed that the pearls and corals only
come out of bitter water, this would not make a difference to the statement of
the Qur’ān. It is the law of nature that things are created from the
collaboration of opposites. A child is born from a mother and a father. Even
though he is nourished in the womb of the mother but in reality he comes into
being through both the father and the mother. Similarly, pearls are produced by
the interaction of both types of water even though they were nourished in bitter
water.
After this, occurs the repetitive verse. Its context and
placement is evident.
وَلَهُ
الْجَوَارِ الْمُنشَآتُ فِي الْبَحْرِ كَالْأَعْلَامِ (٢٤) فَبِأَيِّ آلَاء
رَبِّكُمَا تُكَذِّبَانِ (٢٥)
Attention is directed to another sign which in spite of
conflict shows harmony: it is a marvel of God’s power that ships which are as
huge and hefty as mountains slide on seas whilst the lightest of objects drowns
in water. It is a manifestation of God’s wisdom and power that an object as
heavy as a ship loaded with thousands of tons of cargo sails on water and does
not drown. The word لَهُ
here means that creating such harmony between discordant elements is only in the
authority of God the one and only. It is only because of His power and wisdom
that such marvels come into being and man witnesses them at every place, so
which of the marvels of his Lord will he deny? This subject is discussed in
Sūrah Fātir in the following words:
وَمَا
يَسْتَوِي الْبَحْرَانِ هَذَا عَذْبٌ فُرَاتٌ سَائِغٌ شَرَابُهُ وَهَذَا مِلْحٌ
أُجَاجٌ وَمِن كُلٍّ تَأْكُلُونَ لَحْمًا طَرِيًّا وَتَسْتَخْرِجُونَ حِلْيَةً
تَلْبَسُونَهَا وَتَرَى الْفُلْكَ فِيهِ مَوَاخِرَ لِتَبْتَغُوا مِن فَضْلِهِ
وَلَعَلَّكُمْ تَشْكُرُونَ (١٢:٣٥)
And the two seas are not alike. The one is fresh, sweet,
and pleasant to drink from, while the other is saltish and bitter. And from both
you eat fresh meat, and from both you bring out ornaments to wear. And see how
the ships plough their course through them so that you sail away to seek His
bounty and so that you remain grateful. (35:12)
In Sūrah Shūrā too this subject has been brought up. For
more details, it can be consulted.
كُلُّ مَنْ
عَلَيْهَا فَانٍ (٢٦) وَيَبْقَى وَجْهُ رَبِّكَ ذُو الْجَلَالِ وَالْإِكْرَامِ (٢٧)
فَبِأَيِّ آلَاء رَبِّكُمَا تُكَذِّبَانِ (٢٨)
The antecedent of the genitive pronoun in
عَلَيْهَا is the earth which is
under discussion since verse ten. The way the Almighty has arranged for the
sustenance of man in the earth, the marvels and wisdom He has showed in his
creation, the way He reigns supreme in every nook and corner of the universe and
the way His singularity is evident from the harmony between conflicting elements
necessitates that one day all these things will be destroyed. Only the exalted
and revered person of God will remain. Everyone will be gathered before Him one
day and He will deal with everyone in the manner that person is worthy of. No
one has the slightest authority to contest His decisions or open his mouth to
intercede for someone without His permission.
The words ذُو الْجَلَالِ
وَالْإِكْرَامِ also occur in the last verse of the
sūrah. The purpose of mentioning both these words is that only He is exalted in
His being and thus only He is worthy of being respected and revered by all. No
one else shares these attributes with Him. The word
وَجْهُ (face) here signifies the person of God. Face
is the most lofty portion of a being; for this reason, at times, it signifies
the whole person.
In the end occurs the repetitive verse. It means that
whether they hear the warnings of the Prophet or not, one day everyone will be
destroyed and only the person of God the Almighty will remain; so which of the
signs of their Lord do they deny?
يَسْأَلُهُ مَن
فِي السَّمَاوَاتِ وَالْأَرْضِ كُلَّ يَوْمٍ هُوَ فِي شَأْنٍ (٢٩) فَبِأَيِّ آلَاء
رَبِّكُمَا تُكَذِّبَانِ (٣٠)
The implication of this verse is that God is the real
person to whom everyone turns. Whoever received anything received it from Him.
The word سوال (sawāl) is
used here with regard to its consequences: since everyone who asks receives from
God alone, hence irrespective of whom he asks, he in reality asks God for it.
Asking from others is useless and ineffective. No one other than God can give
him something or take away anything from him. Hence, presenting one’s wishes to
someone while regarding him to be the granter of wishes is mere foolishness.
Whatever a person receives in this world, he receives from God alone and
whatever he will receive in the Hereafter, he will receive from God only.
This word also means “needs” as in
سَوَاء لِّلسَّائِلِينَ (١٠:٤١)
(equal for all those in need, (41:10). If the verse is interpreted while keeping
in view this meaning, it would mean that all those in the heavens and the earth
are needy and dependent on God.
The implication of the words
كُلَّ يَوْمٍ هُوَ فِي شَأْنٍ is that people should not
remain under the misconception that after creating this world, the Almighty has
consigned its administration to their alleged deities and Himself has absolutely
no role to play in this regard. Those who are under this delusion are absolutely
unaware of God’s majesty. God Himself is running all the affairs of this world.
He alone controls the movements of the sun and the moon and He alone fulfils the
needs of His people on this earth. Hence, at every moment of time He is doing
something. The word يَومٌْ
here means “time”, and it is used in this meaning at many places in the Qur’ān.
The implication is that when the Almighty Himself is running the affairs of this
world, what need remains of any intercessor? Hence whatever a person wants, he
should ask God for it.
After this occurs the repetitive verse and means that the
Almighty has not isolated Himself from the affairs of this world; He is
continuously involved in managing and controlling them. His majesty and grandeur
is evident from every nook and corner of this universe. So which of these
majesties will they deny?
سَنَفْرُغُ
لَكُمْ أَيُّهَا الثَّقَلَانِ (٣١) فَبِأَيِّ آلَاء رَبِّكُمَا تُكَذِّبَانِ (٣٢)
The word ثَقَلَانِ
refers to both jinnkind and mankind. Since in their collective capacity both
become heavy, the word ثَقَلَانِ
has been used. Its usage points to the gravity of the challenge which has been
thrown in this verse to both man and jinn at the same time. The implication is
that however weighty and hefty they may be in their collective capacity, the
Almighty will soon confine all His attention to dealing with them. Confining
attention to them here refers to the fact that at the moment this world is
functioning, and God’s wisdom too requires that it complete its term; however,
not far off is the time when this term will reach its completion. At that time,
the Almighty will be free from running this world and direct all His attention
to man’s accountability. He will hold each and every person responsible for his
deeds and after judging him shall accordingly reward or punish him. The style
and words used also show that the Almighty will not attempt this task in a
superficial manner; He will do it with full devotion. This is because it is this
task which is the real objective of creating this world. Without it, this world
is purposeless.
After this occurs the repetitive verse. Here it means that
they have rejected all the obvious signs of this world which point to their
accountability; however, what will they do when they will see the Day of
Judgement and the court of God with their very eyes. Will they deny that at that
time too? If they deny, then how many signs of their Lord will they deny?
Section II (Verses 31-45)
In the succeeding verses, the Day which people are being
warned of is portrayed. The coherence and sequence in the discourse is obvious.
Readers may now proceed to read these verses.
سَنَفْرُغُ
لَكُمْ أَيُّهَا الثَّقَلَانِ (٣١) فَبِأَيِّ آلَاء رَبِّكُمَا تُكَذِّبَانِ (٣٢)
يَا مَعْشَرَ الْجِنِّ وَالْإِنسِ إِنِ اسْتَطَعْتُمْ أَن تَنفُذُوا مِنْ أَقْطَارِ
السَّمَاوَاتِ وَالْأَرْضِ فَانفُذُوا لَا تَنفُذُونَ إِلَّا بِسُلْطَانٍ (٣٣)
فَبِأَيِّ آلَاء رَبِّكُمَا تُكَذِّبَانِ (٣٤) يُرْسَلُ عَلَيْكُمَا شُوَاظٌ مِّن
نَّارٍ وَنُحَاسٌ فَلَا تَنتَصِرَانِ (٣٥) فَبِأَيِّ آلَاء رَبِّكُمَا تُكَذِّبَانِ
(٣٦) فَإِذَا انشَقَّتِ السَّمَاء فَكَانَتْ وَرْدَةً كَالدِّهَانِ (٣٧) فَبِأَيِّ
آلَاء رَبِّكُمَا تُكَذِّبَانِ (٣٨) فَيَوْمَئِذٍ لَّا يُسْأَلُ عَن ذَنبِهِ إِنسٌ
وَلَا جَانٌّ (٣٩) فَبِأَيِّ آلَاء رَبِّكُمَا تُكَذِّبَانِ (٤٠) يُعْرَفُ
الْمُجْرِمُونَ بِسِيمَاهُمْ فَيُؤْخَذُ بِالنَّوَاصِي وَالْأَقْدَامِ (٤١)
فَبِأَيِّ آلَاء رَبِّكُمَا تُكَذِّبَانِ (٤٢) هَذِهِ جَهَنَّمُ الَّتِي يُكَذِّبُ
بِهَا الْمُجْرِمُونَ (٤٣) يَطُوفُونَ بَيْنَهَا وَبَيْنَ حَمِيمٍ آنٍ (٤٤)
فَبِأَيِّ آلَاء رَبِّكُمَا تُكَذِّبَانِ (٤٥)
Both you groups! We are about to find time for you! So
which of your Lord’s majesties would you deny? Mankind and jinn, if you have
power to escape from the confines of the heavens and earth, then try to escape!
You shall not be able to do so without permission. So which of your Lord’s
authorities would you deny? Flames of fire shall be hurled at you and molten
brass. Then you would not be able to shield yourself. So which of your Lord’s
powers would you deny? (31-36)
So remember the time when the sky splits asunder, and
reddens like leather. So which of the wonders of your Lord would you deny? Thus
on that day, there will be no need to ask either man or jinn of his sins. So
which of your Lord’s majesties would you deny? The wrongdoers will be known by
their signs; thus they shall be seized by their forelocks and their feet [and
thrown in Hell]. So which of your Lord’s powers would you deny? This is the Hell
which the sinners had kept denying. They shall circle between it and its boiling
water. So which of your Lord’s majesties would you deny? (37-45)
Explanation
يَا مَعْشَرَ
الْجِنِّ وَالْإِنسِ إِنِ اسْتَطَعْتُمْ أَن تَنفُذُوا مِنْ أَقْطَارِ
السَّمَاوَاتِ وَالْأَرْضِ فَانفُذُوا لَا تَنفُذُونَ إِلَّا بِسُلْطَانٍ (٣٣)
فَبِأَيِّ آلَاء رَبِّكُمَا تُكَذِّبَانِ (٣٤)
If they think that they are accountable before no one and
have absolute authority, they should just attempt to cross the boundaries of the
heavens and the earth created by God so that it can be proven that they are
beyond God’s control or can be beyond His control.
The word سُلْطَان
means “authority” as well as “permission”. Here it is used in the second of
these meanings. However much they may want to cross the boundaries of the
heavens and the earth, they cannot do so. This is only possible when they have
the passport to do so and obviously it is only God who can grant this to them.
Then occurs the repetitive verse. Here it would mean that
if they are not being able to comprehend even this sign of being helpless and
powerless before God, then what other signs and majesties of their Lord will
they continue to deny?
يُرْسَلُ
عَلَيْكُمَا شُوَاظٌ مِّن نَّارٍ وَنُحَاسٌ فَلَا تَنتَصِرَانِ (٣٥) فَبِأَيِّ
آلَاء رَبِّكُمَا تُكَذِّبَانِ (٣٦)
The implication is that if anyone from among them tries to
exceed the bounds and limits set by God, he shall be pelted with flames of fire
and molten brass, and such shall be the profuse nature of this bombardment that
that they will not be able to save themselves from it.
The word شُوَاظٌ مِّن نَّارٍ
refers to shooting stars about which the Qur’ān has
specified that they are pelted at the devils among the jinn who try to penetrate
to the higher heavens and eavesdrop on the matters of the unseen. The Qur’ān has
cited this admission of the jinnfolk through their own words:
وَأَنَّا ظَنَنَّا أَن لَّن نُّعجِزَ اللَّهَ فِي الْأَرْضِ
وَلَن نُّعْجِزَهُ هَرَبًا (٧٢:
١٢) (and that we
acknowledge that we cannot escape God’s grasp by setting off to some place in
this earth or by running away somewhere in the heavens, (72:12)).
Our exegetes have generally regarded the word
نُحَاسٌ to mean “smoke”; however,
this word is not conventionally used in this meaning. Some lexicographers have
mentioned it as its rare meaning and have also corroborated this meaning by a
couplet of the poet Nābighah Dhubyānī. However, in the first place, the
provenance of the couplet itself is debatable and secondly, it is not
comprehensible why the Qur’ān would leave the common Arabic word
دُخَانٌ which means smoke and which
it itself has used and use an unconventional word instead whereas the Qur’ān has
been revealed in eloquent Arabic. For this reason, I have my reservations in
accepting this meaning of the word. In my opinion, the word
نُحَاسٌ is used in its conventional
meaning and it is a type of shooting star mentioned by the words
شُوَاظٌ مِّن نَّارٍ.
The reason for this is that scientific research has shown
that most shooting stars (also called meteors) dissolve in air as soon as they
fall. They fall in the shape of huge balls of siderites and stones; however, the
kinetic energy of the objects transforms into heat as soon as it enters the
layers of the atmosphere. This dissolves the shooting stars and they get
converted into fire-balls and while falling to the earth, most of their metallic
and rocky material is lost or they are transformed into gaseous clouds because
of the process of condensation. However, the meteors which have been found on
earth can be grouped into three categories:
1. Siderites
2. Aerolites
3. Siderolites
Just as ingredients of iron and stone have been found in
these meteors, similarly ingredients of bronze and brass are also found in it.
The latter have been referred to in this verse by the word
نُحَاسٌ. Most of these metallic
components dissolve because of heat intensity; however, their presence in the
meteors which fall to the earth substantiates the statement of the Qur’ān.
فَإِذَا
انشَقَّتِ السَّمَاء فَكَانَتْ وَرْدَةً كَالدِّهَانِ (٣٧) فَبِأَيِّ آلَاء
رَبِّكُمَا تُكَذِّبَانِ (٣٨)
Though people have interpreted the word
ِّدِهَانِ to mean the sediment of
oil, however, this word is also commonly used for skin. Since in this meaning,
the word is more appropriate to be qualified by redness, I have preferred it. At
another place, the words used are: وَإِذَا السَّمَاءُ
كُشِطَتْ (٨٣:
١١) (and when the skies are stripped
bare, (83:11)). In other words just as by stripping the skin, the flesh of the
body appears red, similarly, the sky too would appear red. Here this redness is
compared with the skin, and this comparison is very apt. It is a description of
the arrival of the Day of Judgement. The implication is that today they are
denying this day; however, the day will come when the sky shall be rent asunder,
and this blue roof will appear like red skin; so what will they do at that time?
So which of the majesties of their Lord will they deny? The marvels of His power
will keep manifesting themselves.
فَيَوْمَئِذٍ
لَّا يُسْأَلُ عَن ذَنبِهِ إِنسٌ وَلَا جَانٌّ (٣٩) فَبِأَيِّ آلَاء رَبِّكُمَا
تُكَذِّبَانِ (٤٠) يُعْرَفُ الْمُجْرِمُونَ بِسِيمَاهُمْ فَيُؤْخَذُ بِالنَّوَاصِي
وَالْأَقْدَامِ (٤١) فَبِأَيِّ آلَاء رَبِّكُمَا تُكَذِّبَانِ (٤٢)
They should not remain under the misconception that on
that day God and His angels will have to work hard to investigate their crimes.
It would not even be required to ask someone of his crime, not to speak of hard
work. On that day, each criminal will be recognized by his face; it will be
known from his very face the extent of his crimes and the punishment he will
deserve.
There are many types of questions. Here the questioning
which is refuted relates to investigation and scrutiny. At other places, the Qur’ān
has stated the reason why this would not be required: on that day, not merely
the limbs of the criminals will bear witness; even the roots of each and every
hair will bear witness to his crimes. As far as the questions which relate to
rebuke, reprimand and sarcasm are concerned, they are not negated here. The
questions which are mentioned in the Qur’ān regarding the criminals are of this
second type. Thus there is no contradiction in the Qur’ān in this regard; both
types of questions are of distinct nature.
The words فَيُؤْخَذُ
بِالنَّوَاصِي وَالْأَقْدَامِ depict how these
criminals will be thrown into Hell: they shall be brought before the sentinels
of Hell with the sign of their crime who will seize them by their forelocks and
feet and just as logs of wood are thrown into raging fire, these people shall be
thrown into Hell. Here them being thrown into Hell is not stated in words
because the way these criminals will be seized signifies this. In the presence
of such an indication, such a mention is not required.
The placement of the repetitive verse is very evident:
this phase is soon to come before such people; so which of the signs of their
Lord will they deny?
هَذِهِ
جَهَنَّمُ الَّتِي يُكَذِّبُ بِهَا الْمُجْرِمُونَ (٤٣) يَطُوفُونَ بَيْنَهَا
وَبَيْنَ حَمِيمٍ آنٍ (٤٤) فَبِأَيِّ آلَاء رَبِّكُمَا تُكَذِّبَانِ (٤٥)
These verses say that this is the very Hell which the
criminals have been denying: the time will finally come when they will circle
between its fire and its boiling water. The word آن
refers to water whose heat has reached its ultimate temperature. These verses
depict their extreme helplessness: when the fire of Hell burns them, they will
run in search of water but the water too will be boiling at its ultimate degree.
Their life will be spent going to and fro between these two. In Surah Ghāshiyah,
the words used are: تَصْلَى نَارًا حَامِيَةً تُسْقَى
مِنْ عَيْنٍ آنِيَةٍ (٨٨:
٤-٥) (they will enter the
blazing fire and they will be made to drink from a sizzling spring. (88:4-5)).
The placement and context of the repetitive verse is
evident: today they are denying the Hereafter and the punishment with great
stubbornness; however, when they experience all this, what will they do? How
many of God’s manifestations will they continue to deny?
Section III (Verses 46-78)
After a mention of the fate of the criminals, the
forthcoming verses mention the details of reward which the God-fearing will
receive in the Hereafter. This comparison brings to light the complete picture
of both groups. The coherence in the discourse is very evident. The only thing
that needs to be kept in mind is that verses 46-61 mention the details of the
Paradise of the muqarrabīn (the near ones to God) and the subsequent verses
mention the details of the Paradise of the ashāb al-yamīn (companions of the
right hand). The details of the difference of status between both these groups
is mentioned in the next sūrah: Sūrah Wāqi‘ah which forms a pair with the
current sūrah.
Readers may now proceed to read the coming verses in the
light of this background.
وَلِمَنْ
خَافَ مَقَامَ رَبِّهِ جَنَّتَانِ (٤٦) فَبِأَيِّ آلَاء رَبِّكُمَا تُكَذِّبَانِ
(٤٧) ذَوَاتَا أَفْنَانٍ (٤٨) فَبِأَيِّ آلَاء رَبِّكُمَا تُكَذِّبَانِ (٤٩)
فِيهِمَا عَيْنَانِ تَجْرِيَانِ (٥٠) فَبِأَيِّ آلَاء رَبِّكُمَا تُكَذِّبَانِ (٥١)
فِيهِمَا مِن كُلِّ فَاكِهَةٍ زَوْجَانِ (٥٢) فَبِأَيِّ آلَاء رَبِّكُمَا
تُكَذِّبَانِ (٥٣) مُتَّكِئِينَ عَلَى فُرُشٍ بَطَائِنُهَا مِنْ إِسْتَبْرَقٍ
وَجَنَى الْجَنَّتَيْنِ دَانٍ (٥٤) فَبِأَيِّ آلَاء رَبِّكُمَا تُكَذِّبَانِ (٥٥)
فِيهِنَّ قَاصِرَاتُ الطَّرْفِ لَمْ يَطْمِثْهُنَّ إِنسٌ قَبْلَهُمْ وَلَا جَانٌّ
(٥٦) فَبِأَيِّ آلَاء رَبِّكُمَا تُكَذِّبَانِ (٥٧) كَأَنَّهُنَّ الْيَاقُوتُ
وَالْمَرْجَانُ (٥٨) فَبِأَيِّ آلَاء رَبِّكُمَا تُكَذِّبَانِ (٥٩) هَلْ جَزَاء
الْإِحْسَانِ إِلَّا الْإِحْسَانُ (٦٠) فَبِأَيِّ آلَاء رَبِّكُمَا تُكَذِّبَانِ
(٦١) وَمِن دُونِهِمَا جَنَّتَانِ (٦٢) فَبِأَيِّ آلَاء رَبِّكُمَا تُكَذِّبَانِ
(٦٣) مُدْهَامَّتَانِ (٦٤) فَبِأَيِّ آلَاء رَبِّكُمَا تُكَذِّبَانِ (٦٥) فِيهِمَا
عَيْنَانِ نَضَّاخَتَانِ (٦٦) فَبِأَيِّ آلَاء رَبِّكُمَا تُكَذِّبَانِ (٦٧)
فِيهِمَا فَاكِهَةٌ وَنَخْلٌ وَرُمَّانٌ (٦٨) فَبِأَيِّ آلَاء رَبِّكُمَا
تُكَذِّبَانِ (٦٩) فِيهِنَّ خَيْرَاتٌ حِسَانٌ (٧٠) فَبِأَيِّ آلَاء رَبِّكُمَا
تُكَذِّبَانِ (٧١) حُورٌ مَّقْصُورَاتٌ فِي الْخِيَامِ (٧٢) فَبِأَيِّ آلَاء
رَبِّكُمَا تُكَذِّبَانِ (٧٣) لَمْ يَطْمِثْهُنَّ إِنسٌ قَبْلَهُمْ وَلَا جَانٌّ
(٧٤) فَبِأَيِّ آلَاء رَبِّكُمَا تُكَذِّبَانِ (٧٥) مُتَّكِئِينَ عَلَى رَفْرَفٍ
خُضْرٍ وَعَبْقَرِيٍّ حِسَانٍ (٧٦) فَبِأَيِّ آلَاء رَبِّكُمَا تُكَذِّبَانِ (٧٧)
تَبَارَكَ اسْمُ رَبِّكَ ذِي الْجَلَالِ وَالْإِكْرَامِ (٧٨)
And for those who feared being brought into the presence
of their Lord, there shall be two orchards. So which of your Lord’s blessings
would you deny? Both will have abundant branches. So which of your Lord’s
mercies would you deny? Each will be watered by two springs. So which of your
Lord’s favours would you deny? In them, each fruit will be of a unique type. So
which of your Lord’s blessings would you deny? They shall recline on couches
lined with thick brocade, and the fruits of both gardens will hang over their
heads. So which of your Lord’s favours would you deny? Therein will be bashful
houris whom neither man nor jinn will have touched before. So which of your
Lord’s gifts would you deny? Houris like rubies and corals. So which of your
Lord’s blessings would you deny? The reward of piety will after all be goodness?
So which of your Lord’s goodness would you deny? (46-61)
And besides these, there shall be two other orchards. So
which of your Lord’s blessings would you deny? Both will be greenish black. So
which of your Lord’s mercies would you deny? A gushing fountain shall flow in
each. So which of your Lord’s mercies would you deny? Each will have fruits,
dates and pomegranates. So which of your Lord’s favours would you deny? In each
there shall be houris, noble and gorgeous. So which of your Lord’s blessings
would you deny? Houris, living in tents. So which of your Lord’s graces would
you deny? Whom neither man nor jinn will have touched before. So which of your
Lord’s blessings would you deny? They shall recline on green sheet cloths and
splendid carpets. So which of your Lord’s favours would you deny? Blessed is the
name of your Lord, the Lord of majesty and glory! (62-78)
Explanation
وَلِمَنْ
خَافَ مَقَامَ رَبِّهِ جَنَّتَانِ (٤٦) فَبِأَيِّ آلَاء رَبِّكُمَا تُكَذِّبَانِ
(٤٧)
After the previous verses mention of the fate of the
criminals, these refer to the fate of the righteous. Their quality mentioned
here is that they fear being brought into the presence of God. A similar
allusion to the Day of Judgement is found in the following verse as well:
(٨٣:
٦) يَوْمَ يَقُومُ النَّاسُ لِرَبِّ الْعَالَمِينَ
(the day when men will rise to stand up before the Lord of
the worlds, (83:6)). It needs to be kept in mind that the only thing which keeps
a person on the right path is this fear of facing his Lord. If his heart becomes
devoid of this fear, then nothing can stop a person from becoming the greatest
of criminals.
The verse says that people who fear standing before their
Lord will be given two orchards. The word جَنَّتَ
of the Qur’ān is a comprehensive expression of all the successes of the
Hereafter and two orchards/paradises are mentioned as a completion of favour:
they will receive two orchards. Surah Kahf mentions two orchards in the incident
of the companions of the orchards thus: جَعَلْنَا
لِأَحَدِهِمَا جَنَّتَيْنِ مِنْ أَعْنَابٍ وَحَفَفْنَاهُمَا بِنَخْلٍ (٣٢:١٨)
(to one of them We gave two vineyards surrounded with
palm-trees, (18:32)). While explaining this verse, I have written that the two
orchards it mentions is for completion of favour: God, due to His favour and
grace had blessed them with two orchards, but these favours led them to be
ungrateful instead of being grateful.
After this occurs the repetitive verse and later after
every mention of a favour of Paradise, it will occur. In order to understand the
eloquence of its placement and occasion, one must keep in mind the fact that
people who are addressed here, in the first place, regard the Hereafter to be
improbable; and if as a hypothetical supposition they were ready to accept it,
they were never ready to accept the fact that the destitute Muslims would have a
share in the favours received in the Hereafter. They were of the opinion that if
Paradise is a reality, then just as they have been blessed with all the favours
of this world, they will be blessed with all the favours of the Hereafter as
well. In order to quash this mentality and to crush their pride each and every
favour of Paradise is singled out and it is stressed that they are specifically
for the pious people of God and at the same time these rejecters are asked:
Which of God’s favours will they deny? Today, they might summarily dismiss the
favours of the Hereafter, but how will they deny them when God grants them to
His people and they will end up yearning for them?
ذَوَاتَا
أَفْنَانٍ (٤٨) فَبِأَيِّ آلَاء رَبِّكُمَا تُكَذِّبَانِ (٤٩)
This is an expression of the luxuriance and lushness of
the two orchards being abundant in trees and vegetation. They will not be
desolate and barren: each and every tree will have branches in abundance. After
this occurs the repetitive verse. The reason is that the Arabs relished orchards
the most and took pride in owning them. How fortunate is a person who possesses
a lush green orchard in a dry and hot country! While keeping in view this taste
of theirs, it is said that God will bless the righteous with such orchards: so
which of God’s blessings will they deny?
فِيهِمَا
عَيْنَانِ تَجْرِيَانِ (٥٠) فَبِأَيِّ آلَاء رَبِّكُمَا تُكَذِّبَانِ (٥١)
As a guarantee for the luxuriance of these orchards, each
will have a fountain running in it. So they should speak up as to which of God’s
favours will they deny. Thus the occasion and placement of this repetitive verse
is very evident.
فِيهِمَا
مِن كُلِّ فَاكِهَةٍ زَوْجَانِ (٥٢) فَبِأَيِّ آلَاء رَبِّكُمَا تُكَذِّبَانِ (٥٣)
Both orchards will not have the same types of fruit. Each
will have its own unique repertoire of fruits. The word
زَوْج is used here in a specific
meaning which I have explained earlier at an appropriate place. After this,
occurs the repetitive verse of which the occasion and placement is very evident.
مُتَّكِئِينَ
عَلَى فُرُشٍ بَطَائِنُهَا مِنْ إِسْتَبْرَقٍ وَجَنَى الْجَنَّتَيْنِ دَانٍ (٥٤)
فَبِأَيِّ آلَاء رَبِّكُمَا تُكَذِّبَانِ (٥٥)
These companions of Paradise will recline against cushions
on couches of which the cloth will be lined with thick brocade. In other words,
who can imagine the outer lining of cloths which are internally lined with
brocade? Moreover, the fruits in both orchards will be hanging close to the
heads: reaching out to them will be of no bother. After this, occurs the
repetitive verse of which occasion and placement is very evident.
فِيهِنَّ
قَاصِرَاتُ الطَّرْفِ لَمْ يَطْمِثْهُنَّ إِنسٌ قَبْلَهُمْ وَلَا جَانٌّ (٥٦)
فَبِأَيِّ آلَاء رَبِّكُمَا تُكَذِّبَانِ (٥٧) كَأَنَّهُنَّ الْيَاقُوتُ
وَالْمَرْجَانُ (٥٨) فَبِأَيِّ آلَاء رَبِّكُمَا تُكَذِّبَانِ (٥٩)
The antecedent of the pronoun in
فِيهِنَّ is all the favours
mentioned earlier as well as all the gardens, orchards and castles of Paradise
which may not have been mentioned in words but which are understood to be
obviously implied. Such use of pronouns is very common in Arabic, and example of
this can be seen in the previous pages of this tafsīr.
The verses further say that among the eternal bliss of
these orchards and their resources, there will also be bashful and modest
maidens. Such is the nature of a man that unless he has his wife with him he is
not able to fully enjoy all these favours. God has made her his partner who
shares his joys and sorrows with him. Thus while praising them, the verse says
that they shall be bashful and modest. Bashfulness is not only the greatest
beauty of a woman, it is also the greatest guard of her morality. Women who are
not bashful are unfaithful, those who are unfaithful can be sincere to none, and
when this is so then as a woman there is no purpose to her existence because she
cannot contribute as a building block of a family even though this is the very
purpose of her existence.
The words لَمْ يَطْمِثْهُنَّ
إِنسٌ قَبْلَهُمْ وَلَا جَانٌّ are an expression of
their virginity and chastity. The comparison with rubies and corals is to bring
out their beauty and chastity.
After this, occurs the repetitive verse and its occasion
and placement is very evident.
هَلْ جَزَاء
الْإِحْسَانِ إِلَّا الْإِحْسَانُ (٦٠) فَبِأَيِّ آلَاء رَبِّكُمَا تُكَذِّبَانِ
(٦١)
After mentioning the features of the Paradise of the near
ones, here at the end, the addressees are very subtly asked why they are
surprised to hear that the Almighty will grant all these favours to His pious
people! What else should be the reward of piety and purity except blessings and
favours? If the Creator of this universe does not bring forth a day in which the
wicked are punished for their sins and the pious are rewarded for their virtue,
then this would mean that He does not distinguish between vice and virtue. In
fact, what can even be concluded from this is that, God forbid, He likes vice
more because after giving the wicked all the resources of life, He has set them
free to do whatever they want to and work whatever mischief they desire. A man’s
intellect and nature can never tolerate such an evil estimation about his Lord.
His nature bears witness that the Lord of this universe is very just and
merciful. He will punish those who commit sins and greatly reward the pious for
their virtues. Since this is something very clearly grounded in human nature and
no sensible person in his senses can deny it, it has been stated in a manner
which reflects it being an obvious reality. The word
إِحْسَان is used for piety as well as for the reward
of piety. In this verse, it is used very eloquently in both these meanings.
After this, occurs the repetitive verse: its occasion and
placement is that when this reality is certain and all-acknowledged, then the
Almighty shall definitely reward a person for each of his pious deeds, so which
of His favours will man and jinn deny?
وَمِن
دُونِهِمَا جَنَّتَانِ (٦٢) فَبِأَيِّ آلَاء رَبِّكُمَا تُكَذِّبَانِ (٦٣)
After a mention of the two orchards, a mention of two more
orchards comes up. These two orchards are broadly similar to the previous ones
and in some aspects are distinct from one another. The question which arises is:
will the same people be worthy of both these types of orchards or will they be
different? The correct answer to this question is stated in the next sūrah. In
it, the believers have been divided into two groups: ashāb al-maymanah (companions of the right hand) and al-sābiqūn (the foremost) and mentions two
separate orchards for the two which are similar to one another in some aspects
and dissimilar in some others. Hence, what is more probable is that in this
sūrah too, the earlier two orchards are meant for the ashāb al-maymanah or the
muqarrabīn (the near ones). Now with this verse begins the mention of the
orchards of the ashāb al-maymanah. Obviously, just as there is a difference in
the status of the two groups, there is a difference in the orchards of the two
groups as well, which discerning minds can appreciate. I will also allude to
some of the differences in the coming paragraphs. The words
مِن دُونِهِمَا can be translated as
“besides these two” and “in contrast with these two” as well as “lesser than
these two”.
After this is the repetitive verse which occurs after the
mention of each favour. It would mean that the favours will not end with these
two orchards; there will be other orchards as well; so which of the orchards of
God will man deny?
مُدْهَامَّتَانِ
(٦٤) فَبِأَيِّ آلَاء رَبِّكُمَا تُكَذِّبَانِ (٥٦)
Such will be the state of greenness of these orchards that
they will appear to be blackish. This is the most gorgeous of colours of a lush
orchard. After this, occurs the repetitive verse of which the occasion and
placement is very evident.
فِيهِمَا
عَيْنَانِ نَضَّاخَتَانِ (٦٦) فَبِأَيِّ آلَاء رَبِّكُمَا تُكَذِّبَانِ (٦٧)
The word نَضْخٌ
means something which is “forceful and steaming”. This is a portrayal of
mountain springs. For springs which occur on level ground, the word is تَجْرِيَان used
earlier which means that they only flow; however, mountainous springs flow with
force and vigour. After this, occurs the repetitive verse and its occasion and
placement is very evident.
فِيهِمَا
فَاكِهَةٌ وَنَخْلٌ وَرُمَّانٌ (٦٨) فَبِأَيِّ آلَاء رَبِّكُمَا تُكَذِّبَانِ (٦٩)
A mention of نَخْلٌ
(dates) and رُمَّانٌ
(pomegranate) after فَاكِهَةٌ
(fruit) is a mention of the specific after the general. Both these are
cherished fruits of Arabia. In the mention of earlier
orchards, the words were مِن كُلِّ فَاكِهَةٍ زَوْجَانِ
ie each of the two orchards will have different fruits. The difference between
these two styles needs to be appreciated. After this, occurs the repetitive
verse of which the occasion and placement is very evident.
فِيهِنَّ
خَيْرَاتٌ حِسَانٌ (٧٠) فَبِأَيِّ آلَاء رَبِّكُمَا تُكَذِّبَانِ (٧١) حُورٌ
مَّقْصُورَاتٌ فِي الْخِيَامِ (٧٢) فَبِأَيِّ آلَاء رَبِّكُمَا تُكَذِّبَانِ (٧٣)
لَمْ يَطْمِثْهُنَّ إِنسٌ قَبْلَهُمْ وَلَا جَانٌّ (٧٤) فَبِأَيِّ آلَاء رَبِّكُمَا
تُكَذِّبَانِ (٧٥)
The expression خَيْرَاتٌ حِسَانٌ
means pretty and pious. The expression حُورٌ
مَّقْصُورَاتٌ فِي الْخِيَامِ has a special tinge of
Arabic taste in it. Living in tents was something very cherished in Arabia. The
tents of the affluent people of Arabia were even more classy than their castles
and palaces and here the tents are those found in orchards. It was mentioned
that there will be bashful maidens in the earlier two orchards and they were
compared with corals and rubies. The readers should keep in mind the difference
in qualities of the maidens in both sets of the two orchards. After every
feature of the maidens, occurs the repetitive verse of which the occasion and
placement is very evident.
مُتَّكِئِينَ
عَلَى رَفْرَفٍ خُضْرٍ وَعَبْقَرِيٍّ حِسَانٍ (٧٦) فَبِأَيِّ آلَاء رَبِّكُمَا
تُكَذِّبَانِ (٧٧)
The people of these orchards will be reclining on large
cushions on green sheets and beautiful rare carpets. The word
عَبْقَرِيٌّ is used for rare and
expensive things and it can refer to various things keeping in view the context
and occasion. Keeping in view this context and occasion, in my opinion, it
qualifies carpets. After this, occurs the repetitive verse of which the occasion
and placement is very evident.
تَبَارَكَ
اسْمُ رَبِّكَ ذِي الْجَلَالِ وَالْإِكْرَامِ (٧٨)
Just as earlier on when after mentioning arguments to
substantiate reward and punishment, it was said: كُلُّ
مَنْ عَلَيْهَا فَانٍ (٢٦) وَيَبْقَى وَجْهُ رَبِّكَ ذُو الْجَلَالِ وَالْإِكْرَامِ,
in a similar manner, after elaborating upon some other details of reward and
punishment, the same verse is repeated here. The purpose of this repetition is
that since blessed is the Lord of the Prophet – the Lord of Majesty and Glory,
hence all these favours and blessings will necessarily manifest themselves.
Foolish are the people who think that the Almighty after creating this world has
no concern with its good and evil. Just as in the earlier verse, the word
وَجْهُ (face) was used to signify
the being of God, in this verse the word اسْمُ
(name) is used for this purpose. The name signifies the entity it stands for.
If the features of the orchards mentioned in the previous
verses are deliberated upon, it will become evident that the favours pointed out
in the orchards mentioned earlier reflect more the taste of the non-Arabs, while
those mentioned later reflect more the taste of the Arabs. Though these favours
are stated in the form of simile, their real form is known to God alone. The
purpose of this mention is that this comparison to some extent brings a broad
picture of these favours before us.
I am grateful to God that today on the 24th of Ramadān al-Mubārak
1397 AH, I am able to complete the tafsīr of this sūrah.
فَالْحَمْدُ لِلّهِ عَلَى إِحْسَانِهِ
(gratitude be to God for His favours).
Lahore,
10th September 1977 AD
24th Ramadān al-Mubārak 1397 AH
______________
|