Narratives
about the Sunnah of Nature (fitrah)
1. It is narrated from Abu Hurayrah (rta) that five things
are part of human nature: cutting nails, shaving the
moustache, removing hair from underarms, shaving pubic hair
and circumcision.
Explanation:
This narrative has been deferred but has also been narrated
through a trail of narrators. Human nature means the
requirements that are based on the innate knowledge of good
and evil that is resident within human beings. The
instructions of nature should be from ancient times and should
remain valid forever. Thus, these acts would have been carried
out by Adam (sws) and shall continue to be carried out by his
progeny. The first point stated in the narrative is cutting of
nails. Good human nature demands that nails be cut, as letting
nails grow is an attribute of animals.
In the view of
Malikites, the right way of shaving of the moustache is to
shave it from above the lips. It is known about ‘Umar (rta)
that whenever he was faced with a mission, he would curl his
moustache while pondering. I feel that ‘Umar (rta) would have
done so. The reason is when a problem arises, a person tends
to become weak; his face loses colour. But a man of
determination thinks of ways to resolve the problem and curls
his moustache. ‘Umar (rta) is a worthy example of a man of
determination and a complete demonstration of Islamic culture.
If he had a moustache, then having whiskers means that the
lips should be seen; the moustache can be grown above the
lips. The view of the Malikites is correct in my opinion and
the Ahl-i Hadith carry an extremist point of view in this
matter.
Shaving of the
hair of the underarms and pubic area is also a need of nature.
One feels repulsed if this hair grows. Circumcision is also a
sunnah of nature. There is a strange narrative about Abraham (sws)
that he was circumcised at the age of 80. In reality, if this
instruction belongs to those related to nature, then it would
have been acted upon by people from the beginning. Christians
do not practice it because they have given up their shari‘ah
in following Paul. The same is the situation with Hindus.
2. It is narrated from Sa‘id ibn Musayyab that Abraham (sws)
was the first human to be a host to others; to undergo
circumcision; to trim his moustache and to see his own white
hair in old age. He enquired of God: what was this and God
replied that this was dignity. Whereupon he prayed: O Lord,
make my dignity abundant.
Explanation:
this is a saying of a Muslim who was in the company of one
of the Prophet’s Companions. Some people have traced it to Abu
Hurayrah (rta) but in any case, it is not a Hadith. This is
the reason why its content clashes with the previous
narrative. In this saying, it has been claimed that Abraham (sws)
was the first man to implement some practices. This has
prompted some people to add to the list of practices which
Abraham (sws) may have taken the lead in.
One of the
actions attributed to Abraham (sws) as a first is playing
host. The question arises that there were so many great
prophets before Abraham (sws): did they not host guests and
teach their followers to do the same? Similarly, circumcising
and trimming of the moustache fall within the category of
natural acts, so did the noble souls who preceded Abraham (sws)
not follow these practices? And if Abraham (sws) was the first
man to see old age, did Noah (sws) not grow old and remain
young despite living to be a thousand years old? It is obvious
that there is no practice in this list which can be said to be
nonexistent before Abraham (sws).
It is possible
that the real meaning of Ibn Musayyab was that these pure
practices did not exist within the nation and family of
Abraham (sws) and he was the first one to adopt them. For
example, several prophets before him had been preaching
monotheism but the manner in which he announced it within the
house of idols is unparalleled. If explained thus, Ibn
Musayyab’s narrative can be understood somewhat, otherwise it
negates the previous narrative.
3. Yayha said that he heard from Imam Malik that moustaches
should be trimmed so that the corners of the mouth are
visible. This is also called “atar.” The shaving should not be
so intense that a man mutilates his own body.
Explanation:
This is Imam Malik’s decree which is acted upon by the
Malikites. They believe that a man’s moustache should be at
least such that he may take refuge in them when faced with
difficulties and, like ‘Umar (rta), twirl them when needed.
Narratives
about Prohibition to eat with the Left Hand
1. It is narrated from Jabir ibn ‘Abdullah (rta) that the
Prophet (sws) prohibited anyone from eating with the left
hand, wearing the shoe in only one foot or wear a single cloth
in ishtimal or ihtaba’ which could expose his private parts.
Explanation:
Eating with the left hand is allowed in case of two
compulsions. One may have only one hand or the there could be
something wrong with the right one. Other than this, all clean
acts should be done with the right hand and others with the
left one.
The same holds
for the situation of wearing the shoe on one foot only. If one
has one foot and one walks on crutches, there would be no
objection, but if one does it because of a fashion statement,
this is mere buffoonery. Ishtimal and ihtaba’ have been
explained above so there can be no question of their
prohibition in our case because a shalwar or pyjama does not
expose the body. But for a villager, who wears a sarong or a
single sheet of cloth, there is the possibility of its opening
and care must be taken in that case.
2. It is narrated from ‘Abdullah ibn ‘Umar (rta) that the
Prophet (sws) said that if anyone eats, he should eat with his
right hand and if anyone drinks, he should do so with his
right hand because it is the devil that eats and drinks with
his left hand.
Explanation:
It seems from Ahadith that the devil is the source of all
evil, whether big or small. Here, the Prophet (sws) has
related eating with the left hand to the way of the devil.
Since the originator is always the devil, this act too falls
within this category. Civilized people should not act in this
manner.
Narratives
about the Needy
1. It is narrated from Abu Hurayrah (rta) that the Prophet
(sws) said that a needy person is not one who circles around
people, when someone gives him one bite, another gives him
two, a third gives him one date and another gives him two
dates. People asked the Prophet (sws) who would be a needy
person then and he answered that it would be he who is
deprived of goods that would make him free of want, but
because of his apparent lack of visibly being in a state of
want, people do not understand that he is needy and do not
give to him. He, himself, does not ask of others that they may
understand.
Explanation: This means
that despite being in need, he does not extend his hand in
front of others and remains in a state such that people are
unable to understand whether he is in need that he may be
given something. He himself has self respect and would not
like to suffer the pain of being refused.
2. It is narrated from Ibn Bujayd Ansari’s grandmother that
the Prophet (sws) said: return a needy person from your door,
but with a bone even if it is burnt.
Explanation: This means
the bone that was put in the pan on fire and it was burnt. In
other words, if a needy person comes to one’s door, one should
give him something, even if it is an insignificant thing. The
needy should not be returned from the door without getting
something.
Narratives
about the Intestines of Disbelievers
1. It is narrated from Abu Hurayrah (rta) that the Prophet (sws)
said that a Muslim eats in one intestine and a disbeliever
eats from seven.
Explanation:
this narrative is against the obvious. Therefore, it should be
explained in the light of the subsequent narrative. It seems
that the narrator has taken a piece of this narrative and
shown it as a stand lone Hadith. The result is that it has
been cut off from its origin and source, creating several
questions.
2. It is narrated from Abu Hurayrah (rta) that a disbeliever
came to the Prophet (sws)’s house as a guest. The Prophet (sws)
instructed the milking of a goat for him. He drank this milk.
A second goat was milked and he drank its milk too. Then a
third was milked and he drank that too, until he drank the
milk of seven goats. In the morning, this man accepted Islam.
The Prophet (sws) asked for a goat to be milked for him and he
drank this milk. When the Prophet (sws) had a second goat
milked, he took a few gulps only and said that he was
satiated. At this, the Prophet (sws) said that a believer
drinks from one intestine and a disbeliever from seven.
Explanation:
This is a special incident in which the difference between
the greed, desire and want of a disbeliever and believer has
been made explicit. A believer has patience, satisfaction and
freedom from want. A disbeliever feels that he may not get
another chance. So he must take all that he can get at one
time. This feeling affects his character too. A believer’s
faith affects his character in such a way that he is satisfied
and has trust in God that He who has given him now shall give
again. A disbeliever does not think in this manner.
This narrative
does not determine that all disbelievers behave thus. It is
only an example that has been given. There are many
disbelievers who eat little and many Muslims who eat the share
of the disbelievers too. But it is clear about the attitude a
person of faith should possess in matters of eating and
drinking. This narrative also clarifies the issue with the
previous one, which was only one piece of the whole narrative
shown as a complete one. The narrator of both is Abu Hurayrah
(rta) but the companion is different for both. When the last
piece was removed from its origin, the narrative went against
the obvious but when explained with full context, the point is
clear.
(Translated
by Nikhat Sattar)
|